Literature DB >> 12874296

Hdmx protein stability is regulated by the ubiquitin ligase activity of Mdm2.

Petra de Graaf1, Natalie A Little, Yolande F M Ramos, Erik Meulmeester, Stef J F Letteboer, Aart G Jochemsen.   

Abstract

The stability of the p53 tumor suppressor protein is critically regulated by the Hdm2 and Hdmx proteins. Hdm2 protein levels are auto-regulated by the self-ubiquitination activity of Hdm2 and on the transcriptional level by p53-activated transcription of the hdm2 gene. Little is known about the regulation of Hdmx expression levels, apart from the observation that the Mdmx protein can be cleaved by caspase-3 in a p53-inducible manner. In the functional analysis of two mutant Hdmx proteins, products of two alternatively spliced mRNAs, it was found that Hdmx proteins are targets for ubiquitination by Mdm2. The stability of the Hdmx protein is partly dependent on the presence of its internal acidic domain. Mdm2 appears only to require an intact RING domain to be able to ubiquitinate Hdmx and target it for proteasomal degradation. These findings highlight the intricate functional relationships between p53, Mdm2, and Hdmx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12874296     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M213034200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  72 in total

1.  MdmX is required for p53 interaction with and full induction of the Mdm2 promoter after cellular stress.

Authors:  Lynn Biderman; Masha V Poyurovsky; Yael Assia; James L Manley; Carol Prives
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Spontaneous tumorigenesis in mice overexpressing the p53-negative regulator Mdm4.

Authors:  Shunbin Xiong; Vinod Pant; Young-Ah Suh; Carolyn S Van Pelt; Yongxing Wang; Yasmine A Valentin-Vega; Sean M Post; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Turning the RING domain protein MdmX into an active ubiquitin-protein ligase.

Authors:  Saravanakumar Iyappan; Hans-Peter Wollscheid; Alejandro Rojas-Fernandez; Andreas Marquardt; Hao-Cheng Tang; Rajesh K Singh; Martin Scheffner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Interplay between MDM2, MDMX, Pirh2 and COP1: the negative regulators of p53.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Guifen He; Pingzhao Zhang; Xiang Wang; Mei Jiang; Long Yu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Differential roles of ATM- and Chk2-mediated phosphorylations of Hdmx in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Yaron Pereg; Suzanne Lam; Amina Teunisse; Sharon Biton; Erik Meulmeester; Leonid Mittelman; Giacomo Buscemi; Koji Okamoto; Yoichi Taya; Yosef Shiloh; Aart G Jochemsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  The p53 orchestra: Mdm2 and Mdmx set the tone.

Authors:  Mark Wade; Yunyuan V Wang; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 20.808

7.  MDMX regulation of p53 response to ribosomal stress.

Authors:  Daniele M Gilkes; Lihong Chen; Jiandong Chen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Bridged Analogues for p53-Dependent Cancer Therapy Obtained by S-Alkylation.

Authors:  Ewa D Micewicz; Shantanu Sharma; Alan J Waring; Hai T Luong; William H McBride; Piotr Ruchala
Journal:  Int J Pept Res Ther       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 9.  Targeting Mdm2 and Mdmx in cancer therapy: better living through medicinal chemistry?

Authors:  Mark Wade; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.852

10.  Mechanism of p53 stabilization by ATM after DNA damage.

Authors:  Qian Cheng; Jiandong Chen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.