Literature DB >> 12873763

Architecture of the influenza hemagglutinin membrane fusion site.

Joe Bentz1, Aditya Mittal.   

Abstract

The mechanism of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) mediated membrane fusion has been intensively studied for over 20 years after the bromelain-released ectodomain of HA at neutral pH was first crystallized. Nearly 10 years ago, the low-pH-induced "spring coiled" conformational change of HA was predicted from peptide chemistry and confirmed by crystallography. Other work has yielded a wealth of knowledge on the observed changes in HA fusion/hemifusion phenotypes as a function of site-specific mutations of HA, or added amphipathic molecules or particular IgGs. It is becoming clear that the conformational changes predicted by the crystallography are necessary to cause fusion and that interfering with these changes can block fusion or reduce it to hemifusion. What is not known is how the conformational changes cause fusion. In particular, while it is generally agreed that fusion requires an aggregate of HAs, how the aggregate may act to transduce the energy of the HA conformational changes to creating the initial fusion defect is not known. We have used a comprehensive mass action kinetic model of HA-mediated fusion to carry out a "meta-analysis" of several key data sets, using HA-expressing cells and using virions. The consensus result of these detailed kinetic studies was that the fusion site of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) is an aggregate with at least eight HAs. The high-energy conformational change of only two of these HAs within the aggregate permits the formation of the first fusion pore. This "8 and 2" result was required to best fit all the data. We review these studies and how this kinetic result can guide and constrain HA fusion models. The kinetic analysis suggests that the sequence of fusion intermediates starts with protein control and ends with lipid control, which makes sense. While curvature intermediates, e.g. the lipid stalk, are almost certainly within the fusion sequence, the "8 and 2" result does not suggest that they are the first step after HA aggregation. The stabilized hydrophobic defect model we have proposed as a precursor to the lipid stalk can form and is consistent with the "8 and 2" result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12873763     DOI: 10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00160-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  21 in total

Review 1.  The energetics of membrane fusion from binding, through hemifusion, pore formation, and pore enlargement.

Authors:  F S Cohen; G B Melikyan
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Prm1 targeting to contact sites enhances fusion during mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Valerie N Olmo; Eric Grote
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-08-20

3.  The Interaction between Influenza HA Fusion Peptide and Transmembrane Domain Affects Membrane Structure.

Authors:  Alex L Lai; Jack H Freed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Liposome reconstitution of a minimal protein-mediated membrane fusion machine.

Authors:  Deniz Top; Roberto de Antueno; Jayme Salsman; Jennifer Corcoran; Jamie Mader; David Hoskin; Ahmed Touhami; Manfred H Jericho; Roy Duncan
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  The elementary mass action rate constants of P-gp transport for a confluent monolayer of MDCKII-hMDR1 cells.

Authors:  Thuy Thanh Tran; Aditya Mittal; Tanya Aldinger; Joseph W Polli; Andrew Ayrton; Harma Ellens; Joe Bentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Construction of a gammaretrovirus with a novel tropism and wild-type replication kinetics capable of using human APJ as entry receptor.

Authors:  Shervin Bahrami; Kristina Pagh; Ditte Ejegod; Mogens Duch; Martin Tolstrup; Finn Skou Pedersen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Order and disorder control the functional rearrangement of influenza hemagglutinin.

Authors:  Xingcheng Lin; Nathanial R Eddy; Jeffrey K Noel; Paul C Whitford; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Rotation-Activated and Cooperative Zipping Characterize Class I Viral Fusion Protein Dynamics.

Authors:  Nathanial R Eddy; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  An allosteric rheostat in HIV-1 gp120 reduces CCR5 stoichiometry required for membrane fusion and overcomes diverse entry limitations.

Authors:  Emily J Platt; James P Durnin; Ujwal Shinde; David Kabat
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Kinetically differentiating influenza hemagglutinin fusion and hemifusion machines.

Authors:  Aditya Mittal; Eugenia Leikina; Leonid V Chernomordik; Joe Bentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.