Literature DB >> 12873666

Dose-response for biochemical control among high-risk prostate cancer patients after external beam radiotherapy.

Rex Cheung1, Susan L Tucker, Lei Dong, Deborah Kuban.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The literature on dose-response characteristics of high-risk prostate cancer has been scarce in this era, when these patients are treated with hormone therapy along with radiotherapy. In this study, we estimated the dose-response of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) control probability in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data set contains information on 363 high-risk prostate cancer patients who were treated with external beam radiotherapy without hormonal treatment between February 1987 and September 1998. These patients have one or more of the following adverse prognostic features: digital rectal examination stage > or =cT3, PSA >20 ng/mL, and biopsy Gleason score > or =8. These patients had biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of prostate and were staged according to the 1992 AJCC staging system that was based on digital rectal examination. The logistic model was fitted to the data at various time points after treatment, and the dose-response parameters were estimated.
RESULTS: The dose required to have 50% tumor control, TCD50 (95% confidence interval), for high-risk patients is 75.5 (range: 70.7-80.2) Gy. The gamma 50 (95% confidence interval) is 1.7 (range: 0.7-2.7) around 75.5 Gy. Recursive partitioning analysis based on the null Martingale residuals identifies two subgroups within the high-risk group. The TCD50 estimates of the two subgroups (PSA < or = vs. >20 ng/mL) differ by 15 Gy at 5 years. There is a dose response in both subgroups.
CONCLUSION: We recognize that this study has the usual limitations of a retrospective study that includes treatment policy change that spanned a long time frame. However, our data strongly suggest a benefit of dose escalation for all the patients in the entire high-risk group. There is a steep dose response in PSA control probability around a modern dose of 78 Gy. A 5-Gy dose increase beyond 78 Gy may improve PSA control by about 10%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12873666     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00278-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Assessing the Clinical Impact of Approximations in Analytical Dose Calculations for Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Jan Schuemann; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Clemens Grassberger; Maryam Moteabbed; Chul Hee Min; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A computational tool for the efficient analysis of dose-volume histograms from radiation therapy treatment plans.

Authors:  Anil Pyakuryal; W Kenji Myint; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Sunyoung Jang; Jerilyn A Logemann; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Gerald E Hanks; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Parametrized rectal dose and associations with late toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lynsey J Hamlett; Andrew J McPartlin; Edward J Maile; Gareth Webster; Ric Swindell; Carl G Rowbottom; Ananya Choudhury; Adam H Aitkenhead
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  A TCP-NTCP estimation module using DVHs and known radiobiological models and parameter sets.

Authors:  Brad Warkentin; Pavel Stavrev; Nadia Stavreva; Colin Field; B Gino Fallone
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Assessment of radiobiological metrics applied to patient-specific QA process of VMAT prostate treatments.

Authors:  Francisco Clemente-Gutiérrez; Consuelo Pérez-Vara; María H Clavo-Herranz; Concepción López-Carrizosa; José Pérez-Regadera; Carmen Ibáñez-Villoslada
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.