Literature DB >> 12873570

Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section.

Douglas K Rex1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accessing the proximal sides of colorectal folds, flexures, and valves can be difficult endoscopically and can contribute to missed lesions and failed therapeutic procedures. The aim of this study was to determine whether a prototype colonoscope with a short bending section could facilitate accessing difficult to reach areas proximal to folds, flexures, and valves.
METHODS: In a nonrandomized study, the prototype colonoscope, a standard pediatric colonoscope, and a standard adult colonoscope were used to attempt retroflexion in the cecum and, if unsuccessful, in the right colon.
RESULTS: The prototype colonoscope allowed cecal retroflexion, including clear visualization of the ileocecal valve and the cecal mucosa medial to the valve, in 95% of attempts. A standard pediatric colonoscope was successful in 50% and a standard adult colonoscope in 24.5%. The prototype was more successful than both the standard pediatric (p < 0.001) and the standard adult instrument (p < 0.001). The standard pediatric colonoscope was successful more often than the standard adult colonoscope (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Using the ability to retroflex in the cecum as a surrogate marker, a prototype pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section seems to facilitate retroflexion and visualization of the proximal aspects of difficult to see regions in the proximal colon.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12873570     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07470.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  5 in total

1.  Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup.

Authors:  Peter D Siersema; Amit Rastogi; Anke M Leufkens; Paul A Akerman; Kassem Azzouzi; Richard I Rothstein; Frank P Vleggaar; Alessandro Repici; Giacomo Rando; Patrick I Okolo; Olivier Dewit; Ana Ignjatovic; Elizabeth Odstrcil; James East; Pierre H Deprez; Brian P Saunders; Anthony N Kalloo; Bradley Creel; Vikas Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Daniel C DeMarco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Contained colonic perforation due to cecal retroflexion.

Authors:  Zhuo Geng; Deepak Agrawal; Amit G Singal; Stephen Kircher; Samir Gupta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Does hyoscine butylbromide really improve polyp detection during colonoscopy? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pei-Jing Cui; Jing Yao; Hua-Zhong Han; Yi-Jun Zhao; Jun Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Screening colonoscopy: should we focus more on technique and less on technology?

Authors:  Noor Mohammed; Venkataraman Subramanian
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2013-08-01

5.  Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality.

Authors:  Rajesh N Keswani; Charles J Kahi; Mark Benson; Andrew J Gawron; Tonya R Kaltenbach; Rena H Yadlapati; Dyanna L Gregory; Anna Duloy
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.