AIMS: To compare data from the general population on intentionally reduced smoking and smoking cessation. DESIGN: Longitudinal observation study. SETTING: Northern German region. SUBJECTS: Randomly sampled residents aged 18-64 (T1; n = 4075, response rate 70%). Daily cigarette smokers (n = 1520) were followed up after 30 (T2; n = 913) and 36 months (T3; n = 786). MEASURES: Self-reported smoking-related and socioeconomic variables. Participants were explicitly asked for reduction attempts (reducing cigarettes per day) and maintenance of reduction, which was defined independently of consumption measures. FINDINGS: Between T1 and T2, reduction attempts (39%) were more frequent than quit attempts (33%), and according to self-report, reduction was more likely to be maintained for up to 12 months. Smokers maintaining reduction for up to 6 months had reduced their consumption at T3 by 34% compared with T2. Between T1 and T2, the occurrence of both a reduction and a quit attempt was most frequent (22%), followed by subjects exclusively trying to reduce (17%) and subjects exclusively trying to quit (4%). Subjects who exclusively tried to reduce had a significantly increased probability of further reduction attempts at T3 (OR = 4.4, 95% CI 2.0-10.1), while the probability of quit attempts was equal compared with subjects not attempting to reduce or quit (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.3-3.2). DSM-IV nicotine dependence was less common in subjects who exclusively tried to reduce. Other smoking-related and socioeconomic variables did not predict whether individuals attempted to reduce or attempted to quit. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of general population smokers attempt to reduce, and are able to maintain reduction of, cigarette consumption over time. Reduction attempts did not reduce the probability of a subsequent cessation attempt.
AIMS: To compare data from the general population on intentionally reduced smoking and smoking cessation. DESIGN: Longitudinal observation study. SETTING: Northern German region. SUBJECTS: Randomly sampled residents aged 18-64 (T1; n = 4075, response rate 70%). Daily cigarette smokers (n = 1520) were followed up after 30 (T2; n = 913) and 36 months (T3; n = 786). MEASURES: Self-reported smoking-related and socioeconomic variables. Participants were explicitly asked for reduction attempts (reducing cigarettes per day) and maintenance of reduction, which was defined independently of consumption measures. FINDINGS: Between T1 and T2, reduction attempts (39%) were more frequent than quit attempts (33%), and according to self-report, reduction was more likely to be maintained for up to 12 months. Smokers maintaining reduction for up to 6 months had reduced their consumption at T3 by 34% compared with T2. Between T1 and T2, the occurrence of both a reduction and a quit attempt was most frequent (22%), followed by subjects exclusively trying to reduce (17%) and subjects exclusively trying to quit (4%). Subjects who exclusively tried to reduce had a significantly increased probability of further reduction attempts at T3 (OR = 4.4, 95% CI 2.0-10.1), while the probability of quit attempts was equal compared with subjects not attempting to reduce or quit (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.3-3.2). DSM-IV nicotine dependence was less common in subjects who exclusively tried to reduce. Other smoking-related and socioeconomic variables did not predict whether individuals attempted to reduce or attempted to quit. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of general population smokers attempt to reduce, and are able to maintain reduction of, cigarette consumption over time. Reduction attempts did not reduce the probability of a subsequent cessation attempt.
Authors: John R Hughes; Laura J Solomon; Amy E Livingston; Peter W Callas; Erica N Peters Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ralph S Caraballo; Judy Kruger; Kat Asman; Linda Pederson; Rachel Widome; Catarina I Kiefe; Brian Hitsman; David R Jacobs Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Carla J Berg; Janet L Thomas; Hongfei Guo; Lawrence C An; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Tracie C Collins; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Wenying Lu; Kate Chappell; Julia A E Walters; Glenn A Jacobson; Rahul Patel; Natalie Schüz; Stuart G Ferguson Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Marc E Mooney; Eric O Johnson; Naomi Breslau; Laura J Bierut; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Amanda R Mathew; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Bryan W Heckman; Amy E Wahlquist; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 4.244