UNLABELLED: Patient motion can cause image artifacts in single photon emission computed tomography despite restraining measures. Data-driven detection and correction of motion can be achieved by comparison of acquired data with the forward projections. This enables the brain locations to be estimated and data to be correctly incorporated in a three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction algorithm. Digital and physical phantom experiments were performed to explore practical aspects of this approach. METHODS: Noisy simulation data modeling multiple 3-D patient head movements were constructed by projecting the digital Hoffman brain phantom at various orientations. Hoffman physical phantom data incorporating deliberate movements were also gathered. Motion correction was applied to these data using various regimes to determine the importance of attenuation and successive iterations. Studies were assessed visually for artifact reduction, and analyzed quantitatively via a mean registration error (MRE) and mean square difference measure (MSD). RESULTS: Artifacts and distortion in the motion corrupted data were reduced to a large extent by application of this algorithm. MRE values were mostly well within 1 pixel (4.4 mm) for the simulated data. Significant MSD improvements (>2) were common. Inclusion of attenuation was unnecessary to accurately estimate motion, doubling the efficiency and simplifying implementation. Moreover, most motion-related errors were removed using a single iteration. The improvement for the physical phantom data was smaller, though this may be due to object symmetry. CONCLUSION: These results provide the basis of an implementation protocol for clinical validation of the technique.
UNLABELLED: Patient motion can cause image artifacts in single photon emission computed tomography despite restraining measures. Data-driven detection and correction of motion can be achieved by comparison of acquired data with the forward projections. This enables the brain locations to be estimated and data to be correctly incorporated in a three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction algorithm. Digital and physical phantom experiments were performed to explore practical aspects of this approach. METHODS: Noisy simulation data modeling multiple 3-D patient head movements were constructed by projecting the digital Hoffman brain phantom at various orientations. Hoffman physical phantom data incorporating deliberate movements were also gathered. Motion correction was applied to these data using various regimes to determine the importance of attenuation and successive iterations. Studies were assessed visually for artifact reduction, and analyzed quantitatively via a mean registration error (MRE) and mean square difference measure (MSD). RESULTS: Artifacts and distortion in the motion corrupted data were reduced to a large extent by application of this algorithm. MRE values were mostly well within 1 pixel (4.4 mm) for the simulated data. Significant MSD improvements (>2) were common. Inclusion of attenuation was unnecessary to accurately estimate motion, doubling the efficiency and simplifying implementation. Moreover, most motion-related errors were removed using a single iteration. The improvement for the physical phantom data was smaller, though this may be due to object symmetry. CONCLUSION: These results provide the basis of an implementation protocol for clinical validation of the technique.
Authors: Bing Feng; Howard C Gifford; Richard D Beach; Guido Boening; Michael A Gennert; Michael A King Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: B Feng; P P Bruyant; P H Pretorius; R D Beach; H C Gifford; J Dey; M Gennert; M A King Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 1.679
Authors: Michael A King; Joyoni Dey; Karen Johnson; Paul Dasari; Joyeeta M Mukherjee; Joseph E McNamara; Arda Konik; Cliff Lindsay; Shaokuan Zheng; Dennis Coughlin Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Chuan Huang; Jerome L Ackerman; Yoann Petibon; Thomas J Brady; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ling-Li Zeng; Danhong Wang; Michael D Fox; Mert Sabuncu; Dewen Hu; Manling Ge; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chuan Huang; Jerome L Ackerman; Yoann Petibon; Marc D Normandin; Thomas J Brady; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Richard D Beach; P Hendrik Pretorius; Guido Boening; Philippe P Bruyant; Bing Feng; Roger R Fulton; Michael A Gennert; Suman Nadella; Michael A King Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.679
Authors: Philippe P Bruyant; Michael A Gennert; Glen C Speckert; Richard D Beach; Joel D Morgenstern; Neeru Kumar; Suman Nadella; Michael A King Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.679
Authors: Joseph E McNamara; Philippe Bruyant; Karen Johnson; Bing Feng; Andre Lehovich; Songxiang Gu; Michael A Gennert; Michael A King Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.679