Literature DB >> 12872566

[Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our Center].

Gianluca Benincà1, Corrado Garrone, Fabrizio Rebecchi, Claudio Giaccone, Mario Morino.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, in terms of operative times, complications and length of hospital stay, using the Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.). Twenty-five patients underwent robotic procedures. The indications were gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in 13 cases, achalasia in 2, cholelithiasis in 2, adrenal adenoma in Cushing syndrome in 6, pheochromocytoma in 2, and incidentaloma in 1. Robotic surgery was compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach. From January to September 2002 13 Nissen-Rossetti fundoplications, 2 Heller myotomies with Dor fundoplication, 2 cholecystectomies and 9 adrenalectomies (6 left adrenalectomies, 3 right adrenalectomies) were performed. There were no significant differences in age, preoperative body mass index (mean 28; range: 18-32) or sex between patients treated by robotic surgery and those treated by traditional laparoscopy. Operative times were significantly longer in the robotic surgery group (97.1 minutes, range: 77-126 minutes, versus 82.5 minutes, range: 65-100 minutes, for Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication; 132.8 minutes, range 104-181 minutes, versus 82.1 minutes, range 55-120 minutes, for adrenalectomy). There were no intraoperative complications. Conversion to traditional laparoscopy was necessary owing to technical difficulties in 4/9 adrenalectomies (44.4%; 3 left, 1 right). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay (3.2 days, range 2-7 days, for Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication; 5.7 days, range 4-9 days, for adrenalectomy). Our study confirms the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. However, operative times were longer and costs higher, with no difference in outcomes. Given the current level of technology and experience, robotic surgery would not appear to afford any advantage over standard laparoscopic approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12872566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chir Ital        ISSN: 0009-4773


  13 in total

Review 1.  The emerging role of robotics in adrenal surgery.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Brandon J Otto; Joseph J Del Pizzo
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Robotic adrenalectomy by an open surgeon: are outcomes different?

Authors:  Shankar R Raman; Emil Shakov; Nino Carnevale; Anusak Yiengpruksawan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-07-08

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cardiomyotomy.

Authors:  Heinz F Wykypiel; Johannes Bodner; Florian Augustin; Oliver Renz; Elisabeth Hoeller; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Morino; G Benincà; G Giraudo; G M Del Genio; F Rebecchi; C Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Mi; Yingxin Kang; Xiao Chen; Bingjun Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Adrenal surgery in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Rosalia Misseri
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  No relevant difference in quality of life and functional outcome at 12 months' follow-up-a randomised controlled trial comparing robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; M A Reiter; A Mehrabi; M N Wente; L Fischer; J Köninger; C N Gutt
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution's experience.

Authors:  J M Winter; M A Talamini; C L Stanfield; D C Chang; J D Hundt; A P Dackiw; K A Campbell; R D Schulick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Emerging role of robotics in urology.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; M A Reiter; M N Wente; V V Bintintan; J Köninger; M W Büchler; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.