Literature DB >> 12872339

Targeted filgrastim support in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma: toward the implementation of a risk model.

Edgardo Rivera1, M Haim Erder, Timothy D Moore, Thomas L Shiftan, Chris A Knight, Moshe Fridman, Carol Brannan, Laurence Danel-Moore, Gabriel N Hortobagyi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe neutropenia, a common consequence of chemotherapy, may result in infectious complications and hospitalizations. Preventive treatment with colony-stimulating factors is limited because of the inability to predict which patients will develop neutropenic complications. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first large prospective validation of a risk model in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma.
METHODS: Patients with Stage I-III breast carcinoma who were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n=624) were assigned to risk groups based on first-cycle absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadirs of <0.5 x 10(9)/L. Filgrastim (a recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor) was administered from Cycle 2 onward to high-risk patients. Dose intensity and rates of neutropenic complications, including febrile neutropenia and hospitalization resulting from it, were calculated for each group and compared. High-risk patients were matched by chemotherapy regimen, stage of disease, age, and baseline ANC to historic-control patients and outcomes were compared within the matched pairs.
RESULTS: Both risk groups were found to have a similar proportion of patients receiving >85% of the dose intensity (95.8% vs. 94.4%). The rate of febrile neutropenia and hospitalization in the low-risk group (n=264) was 2.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7-4.5%) and 0.8 (95% CI, -0.3-1.9%), respectively. The high-risk group was 2.6 times more likely to receive a full dose of chemotherapy, but no higher risk of neutropenic complications was reported compared with the matched controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk-related prophylactic administration of filgrastim facilitated the delivery of planned chemotherapy to the high-risk group of patients. However, further research is needed to confirm the results obtained in the current study in a randomized trial, if feasible, and in other chemotherapy and disease settings. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12872339     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  A retrospective analysis of nadir-neutropenia directed pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia rates in (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy regimens.

Authors:  Sarah J Zardawi; Ina Nordman; Nicholas Zdenkowski
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-08-06

2.  Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pinkie Chambers; Yogini Jani; Li Wei; Emma Kipps; Martin D Forster; Ian C K Wong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer.

Authors:  C T Kouroukis; S Chia; S Verma; D Robson; C Desbiens; C Cripps; J Mikhael
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  First-cycle absolute neutrophil count can be used to improve chemotherapy-dose delivery and reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving adjuvant therapy: a validation study.

Authors:  Edgardo Rivera; M Haim Erder; Moshe Fridman; Debra Frye; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.