Literature DB >> 12872151

Comparison between conventional banding analysis and FISH screening with an AML-specific set of probes in 260 patients.

Maria Christina Cox1, Paola Panetta, Adriano Venditti, Giovanni Del Poeta, Annibale Franchi, Francesco Buccisano, Anna Tamburini, Luca Maurillo, Sergio Amadori.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is becoming popular in the diagnosis of clonal chromosomal abnormalities. We set up a fast FISH procedure using an extensive set of specific probes. Conventional banding analysis (CBA) and FISH were compared in 260 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. For FISH the following probes were used: MLL, CBF-beta/MYH11, ETV-6/AML1; AML1/ETO, BCR/ABL, PML/RAR, c-MYC, TP53, RB1, 5q31/5p15.2, 5q33-34, 7q31/CEP7, 20q13; CEP 4, X, Y. Result time was 96 h for CBA versus 5 h for FISH from direct harvest. CBA showed clonal abnormalities in 41% (n=105/260), normal karyotype in 39% (n=102/260) and failed in 20% (n=53/260). FISH screened all patients and detected abnormalities in 39% (n=102/260); CBA and FISH together identified abnormalities in 49% (n=128/260). In six patients with normal CBA and in eight patients with clonal karyotype, it detected further cryptic abnormalities. CBA showed clonal abnormalities in 13% of patients negative at FISH (n=21/158). FISH screening does not add relevant information to CBA, but is the quickest method for detecting major genetic abnormalities in AML. The speed of FISH is very valuable in AML-M3/M3v because PML/RAR+ patients require specific therapy. Furthermore, we suggest FISH screening in failed, complex or suboptimal quality chromosome and specific FISH analysis for 5q, 7q, 12p, 17p, inv(16), t(11q23) in order to implement CBA accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12872151     DOI: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol J        ISSN: 1466-4860


  3 in total

1.  Potential clinical impact of three-dimensional visualization for fluorescent in situ hybridization image analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Shibo Li; Zheng Bin; Roy Zhang; Yuhua Li; Huimin Tian; Wei Chen; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Acute myeloid leukemia with the t(8;21) translocation: clinical consequences and biological implications.

Authors:  Håkon Reikvam; Kimberley Joanne Hatfield; Astrid Olsnes Kittang; Randi Hovland; Øystein Bruserud
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-03

3.  Cytogenetic Profile of de novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Malaysia.

Authors:  Chin Yuet Meng; Puteri J Noor; Azli Ismail; Mohd Fadly Md Ahid; Zubaidah Zakaria
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2013-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.