Literature DB >> 12871884

A prospective dose-finding study of the amount of thermal energy required for laparoscopic ovarian diathermy.

S A K Amer1, T C Li, I D Cooke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective dose-finding study was undertaken to determine the optimal amount of thermal energy required for laparoscopic ovarian diathermy (LOD) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
METHODS: Thirty women with clomiphene-resistant PCOS were included in the study. All women underwent LOD. A modified Monte Carlo up-and-down design was utilized. Women were treated in groups of three (10 groups). The amount of energy applied was standardized at 150 J/puncture. The number of punctures in each group was decreased/increased according to the number of responders in the previous group. The main outcome was ovulation as defined by a serum progesterone concentration of > or =30 nmol/l.
RESULTS: Four groups (n=12) were treated with four punctures/ovary, three groups (n=9) with three punctures, two groups (n=6) with two punctures and one group (n=3) with one puncture. Ovulation occurred in 67, 44, 33 and 33% of women treated with four, three, two and one puncture/ovary respectively. The corresponding pregnancy rates were 67, 56, 17 and 0%. The reductions in the free androgen index and the serum concentrations of testosterone and androstenedione after LOD were observed only in women treated with three and four punctures/ovary.
CONCLUSION: The clinical response to LOD seems to be dose-dependent, with an increase in the frequency of ovulation and conception with an increasing dose of thermal energy up to 600 J/ovary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12871884     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic ovarian drilling: An alternative but not the ultimate in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Subarna Mitra; Prasanta Kumar Nayak; Sarita Agrawal
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

Review 2.  Resistance to the Insulin and Elevated Level of Androgen: A Major Cause of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Haigang Ding; Juan Zhang; Feng Zhang; Songou Zhang; Xiaozhen Chen; Wenqing Liang; Qiong Xie
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 3.  Ovarian Drilling: Back to the Future.

Authors:  Antonio Mercorio; Luigi Della Corte; Maria Chiara De Angelis; Cira Buonfantino; Carlo Ronsini; Giuseppe Bifulco; Pierluigi Giampaolino
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.948

4.  Comparison of Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling Success between Two Standard and Dose-Adjusted Methods in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Leili Hafizi; Maliheh Amirian; Yasmin Davoudi; Mona Jaafari; G Hazal Ghasemi
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 5.  Fertility Treatment Options for Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Shital Sawant; Priya Bhide
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2019-12-27

Review 6.  Molecular Mechanisms of Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling and Its Therapeutic Effects in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Kok-Min Seow; Yi-Wen Chang; Kuo-Hu Chen; Chi-Chang Juan; Chen-Yu Huang; Li-Te Lin; Kuan-Hao Tsui; Yi-Jen Chen; Wen-Ling Lee; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.