PURPOSE: To evaluate in-field progression and survival of patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in relation to adequacy of coverage of thoracic regional nodal areas in the radiotherapy volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1705 patients from four large RTOG trials (78-11, 79-17, 83-11 and 84-07) were analyzed for this purpose. For each of these trials, the dose delivered to nodal regions was recorded and an assessment of adequacy of field borders was made. Each nodal site was assessed for progression, defined as in-field or out-of-field. In patients who had adequate borders on nodal regions, the results were analyzed according to the dose delivered. RESULTS: The majority (74%) of patients were between the age of 55-75. Forty-six percent of the patients had KPS of 60-80 and 52% had KPS of 90-100. Sixty percent of patients had a weight loss of less than 5% in the 6 months prior to diagnosis. Deviations from the protocol in field borders (borders not per protocol) were most frequent for the contralateral hilum (25.2%) and least frequent in the ipsilateral hilum (6.3%). The adequacy of ipsilateral hilar coverage was important for preventing the in-field progression (11.6 vs. 22% for adequately vs. inadequately covered ipsilateral hilum, respectively, P=0.01), however, did not influence the 2-year-survival (35 vs. 37%) or median survival (1.3 vs. 1.1 year). Neither the in-field progression nor the 2-year-survival were affected by adequacy of nodal coverage in the mediastinum, ipsilateral supraclavicular area and contralateral hilum, even when different doses were analyzed. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that elective irradiation of mediastinal, contralateral hilar and supraclavicular lymph nodes may not be necessary in the treatment of unresectable NSCLC.
PURPOSE: To evaluate in-field progression and survival of patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in relation to adequacy of coverage of thoracic regional nodal areas in the radiotherapy volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1705 patients from four large RTOG trials (78-11, 79-17, 83-11 and 84-07) were analyzed for this purpose. For each of these trials, the dose delivered to nodal regions was recorded and an assessment of adequacy of field borders was made. Each nodal site was assessed for progression, defined as in-field or out-of-field. In patients who had adequate borders on nodal regions, the results were analyzed according to the dose delivered. RESULTS: The majority (74%) of patients were between the age of 55-75. Forty-six percent of the patients had KPS of 60-80 and 52% had KPS of 90-100. Sixty percent of patients had a weight loss of less than 5% in the 6 months prior to diagnosis. Deviations from the protocol in field borders (borders not per protocol) were most frequent for the contralateral hilum (25.2%) and least frequent in the ipsilateral hilum (6.3%). The adequacy of ipsilateral hilar coverage was important for preventing the in-field progression (11.6 vs. 22% for adequately vs. inadequately covered ipsilateral hilum, respectively, P=0.01), however, did not influence the 2-year-survival (35 vs. 37%) or median survival (1.3 vs. 1.1 year). Neither the in-field progression nor the 2-year-survival were affected by adequacy of nodal coverage in the mediastinum, ipsilateral supraclavicular area and contralateral hilum, even when different doses were analyzed. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that elective irradiation of mediastinal, contralateral hilar and supraclavicular lymph nodes may not be necessary in the treatment of unresectable NSCLC.
Authors: Marie Wanet; Antoine Delor; François-Xavier Hanin; Benoît Ghaye; Aline Van Maanen; Vincent Remouchamps; Christian Clermont; Samuel Goossens; John Aldo Lee; Guillaume Janssens; Anne Bol; Xavier Geets Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Mark E Bernard; Hyun Kim; Malolan S Rajagopalan; Brandon Stone; Umar Salimi; Jean-Claude Rwigema; Michael W Epperly; Hongmei Shen; Julie P Goff; Darcy Franicola; Tracy Dixon; Shaonan Cao; Xichen Zhang; Hong Wang; Donna B Stolz; Joel S Greenberger Journal: In Vivo Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Karla A Lee; Guhan Rangaswamy; Naomi A Lavan; Mary Dunne; Conor D Collins; Cormac Small; Pierre Thirion Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Jonathan G Thomas; Rojano Kashani; James M Balter; Daniel Tatro; Feng-Ming Kong; Charlie C Pan Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 1.482