AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic importance of the spatial QRS-T angle for fatal and non-fatal cardiac events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded in 6134 men and women aged 55 years and over from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. Spatial QRS-T angles were categorized as normal, borderline or abnormal. Using Cox's proportional hazards model, abnormal angles showed increased hazard ratios of cardiac death (age-and sex-adjusted hazard ratio 5.2 (95% CI 4.0-6.8)), non-fatal cardiac events (2.2 (1.5-3.1)), sudden death (5.6 (3.7-8.5)) and total mortality (2.3 (2.0-2.7)). None of the classical cardiovascular and ECG predictors provided larger hazard ratios. After adjustment for these predictors, the association of abnormal spatial QRS-T angles with all fatal study endpoints remained strong, but the association with non-fatal cardiac events disappeared. Computation of Akaike's information criterion showed that the angle contributed significantly to the prediction of all fatal endpoints by classical cardiovascular and ECG predictors. CONCLUSION: The spatial QRS-T angle is a strong and independent predictor of cardiac mortality in the elderly. It is stronger than any of the classical cardiovascular risk factors and ECG risk indicators and provides additional value to them in predicting fatal cardiac events.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic importance of the spatial QRS-T angle for fatal and non-fatal cardiac events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded in 6134 men and women aged 55 years and over from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. Spatial QRS-T angles were categorized as normal, borderline or abnormal. Using Cox's proportional hazards model, abnormal angles showed increased hazard ratios of cardiac death (age-and sex-adjusted hazard ratio 5.2 (95% CI 4.0-6.8)), non-fatal cardiac events (2.2 (1.5-3.1)), sudden death (5.6 (3.7-8.5)) and total mortality (2.3 (2.0-2.7)). None of the classical cardiovascular and ECG predictors provided larger hazard ratios. After adjustment for these predictors, the association of abnormal spatial QRS-T angles with all fatal study endpoints remained strong, but the association with non-fatal cardiac events disappeared. Computation of Akaike's information criterion showed that the angle contributed significantly to the prediction of all fatal endpoints by classical cardiovascular and ECG predictors. CONCLUSION: The spatial QRS-T angle is a strong and independent predictor of cardiac mortality in the elderly. It is stronger than any of the classical cardiovascular risk factors and ECG risk indicators and provides additional value to them in predicting fatal cardiac events.
Authors: Tuomas Kenttä; Mari Karsikas; Antti Kiviniemi; Mikko Tulppo; Tapio Seppänen; Heikki V Huikuri Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: David G Strauss; Nathan Mewton; Richard L Verrier; Bruce D Nearing; Francis E Marchlinski; Tony Killian; John Moxley; Larisa G Tereshchenko; Katherine C Wu; Raimond Winslow; Christopher Cox; Peter M Spooner; João A C Lima Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-10-12
Authors: Sofia Skampardoni; Dimitrios Poulikakos; Marek Malik; Darren Green; Philip A Kalra Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Zhu-Ming Zhang; Ronald J Prineas; Douglas Case; Elsayed Z Soliman; Pentti M Rautaharju Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Todd T Schlegel; Walter B Kulecz; Alan H Feiveson; E Carl Greco; Jude L DePalma; Vito Starc; Bojan Vrtovec; M Atiar Rahman; Michael W Bungo; Matthew J Hayat; Terry Bauch; Reynolds Delgado; Stafford G Warren; Tulio Núñez-Medina; Rubén Medina; Diego Jugo; Håkan Arheden; Olle Pahlm Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Kelvin C M Chua; Carmen Teodorescu; Kyndaron Reinier; Audrey Uy-Evanado; Aapo L Aro; Sandeep G Nair; Harpriya Chugh; Jonathan Jui; Sumeet S Chugh Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2016-05-24