Literature DB >> 12870732

Non-invasive predictors of the presence of large oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

K C Thomopoulos1, C Labropoulou-Karatza, K P Mimidis, E C Katsakoulis, G Iconomou, V N Nikolopoulou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The usual clinical practice is to screen all patients with established cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis by upper endoscopy for the presence of varices. Patients with large varices should be treated with non-selective beta blockers to reduce the incidence of first variceal bleeding. However, fewer than 50% of cirrhotic patients have varices at screening endoscopy and most have small sized varices, with a low risk of bleeding. The aim of the present study was to determine whether clinical or laboratory non-endoscopic parameters could predict the presence of large oesophageal varices. PATIENTS/
METHODS: Seventeen variables considered relevant to the prevalence of oesophageal varices were tested in 184 patients with cirrhosis, who underwent screening endoscopy. Small varices were regarded as those which flatten with insufflation or slightly protrude into the lumen, while large varices are those which protrude into the lumen or touch each other. None of the patients was on beta blockers or other vasoactive drugs or had a history of variceal bleeding.
RESULTS: Oesophageal varices were present in 92 patients (50%), and large varices in 33 patients (17.9%). Variables associated with the presence of large oesophageal varices on univariate analysis were the presence of ascites and splenomegaly either by clinical examination or by ultrasound (p < 0.01), the presence of spiders (p = 0.02), platelet count (p < 0.0001), and bilirubin (p = 0.01). Factors independently associated with the presence of large oesophageal varices on multivariate analysis were platelet count, size of spleen and presence of ascites by ultrasound. Using mean values as cut-off points, it is noteworthy that only five out of 39 patients (12.8%) with platelets > or = 18(x 10(9)/l), spleen length < or = 135 mm and no ascites had varices. Moreover, all these patients had small sized varices. On the other hand, 15 out of 18 patients (83.3%) with a platelet count < 118 x 10(9)/l, spleen length > 135 mm and ascites had varices. Moreover, five out of those 18 patients had large varices (28.3%).
CONCLUSION: Thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly and ascites are independent predictors of large oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. We suggest that endoscopy could be avoided safely in cirrhotic patients with none of these predictive factors, as large varices are absent in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12870732     DOI: 10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00219-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  41 in total

1.  Post-gastrectomy spleen enlargement and esophageal varices: distal vs total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Takatsugu Oida; Kenji Mimatsu; Hisao Kano; Atsushi Kawasaki; Youichi Kuboi; Nobutada Fukino; Sadao Amano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prediction of oesophageal varices with platelet count/spleen diameter ratio or platelets alone.

Authors:  D Thabut; V Ratziu; J-B Trabut; T Poynard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Management of esophageal varices: an update from Digestive Disease Week and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2003.

Authors:  Samer Gawrieh; Kia Saeian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-06

4.  Improved prognosis of cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices and thrombocytopenia treated by endoscopic variceal ligation plus partial splenic embolization.

Authors:  Kenji Ohmoto; Naoko Yoshioka; Yasuyuki Tomiyama; Norikuni Shibata; Michihiko Takesue; Koji Yoshida; Makoto Kuboki; Shinichiro Yamamoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Per rectal portal scintigraphy as a useful tool for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Taned Chitapanarux; Ong-ard Praisontarangkul; Satawat Thongsawat; Pises Pisespongsa; Apinya Leerapun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Non-invasive prediction of oesophageal varices in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Sambit Sen; William Jh Griffiths
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Platelet count, spleen length, and platelet count-to-spleen length ratio for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Juan Cristóbal Gana; Jason Yap; Thomasin Adams-Webber; Natalie Rashkovan; Simon C Ling; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-26

8.  Right liver lobe/albumin ratio: contribution to non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Tamara Alempijevic; Vladislava Bulat; Srdjan Djuranovic; Nada Kovacevic; Rada Jesic; Dragan Tomic; Slobodan Krstic; Miodrag Krstic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Portal hemodynamics as predictors of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-K Tarzamni; Mohammad-H Somi; Sara Farhang; Morteza Jalilvand
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Platelet count to spleen diameter ratio for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: Is it feasible?

Authors:  Waqas Wahid Baig; M V Nagaraja; Muralidhar Varma; Ravindra Prabhu
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.