Literature DB >> 12870162

Combination treatment with metformin and glibenclamide versus single-drug therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, comparative study.

Flavia Tosi1, Michele Muggeo, Elisabetta Brun, Giovanna Spiazzi, Laura Perobelli, Elisabetta Zanolin, Mario Gori, Alessandro Coppini, Paolo Moghetti.   

Abstract

To compare efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea with each of these drugs alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, 88 type 2 diabetic subjects (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] levels, 8.0%+/-1.0%; age, 57.3+/-7.1 years; body mass index [BMI]. 27.0+/-2.6 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 9.8+/-8.2 years; means +/- SD) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with metformin (500 to 3,000 mg/d), glibenclamide (5 to 15 mg/d), or their combination (metformin 400 to 2,400 mg/d + glibenclamide 2.5 to 15 mg/d) for 6 months. Thereafter, groups were crossed over for the following 6 months. Thus, each patient received metformin or glibenclamide alone, and the combination treatment. Doses were titrated to obtain HbA1c levels < or = 6.0% and fasting plasma glucose levels less than 140 mg/dL. Eighty patients concluded both treatment periods and were included in the analysis of treatment efficacy. In patients receiving metformin or glibenclamide alone, the maximal dose was reached in 21 and 25 patients, respectively; 8 and 15 of these subjects, respectively, required the maximal dose when they were on the combination treatment. During the study, 4 (10.0%) subjects receiving metformin, 7 (17.1%) receiving glibenclamide, and 31 (39.2%) receiving the combination treatment reached HbA1c levels < or = 6.0%. Moreover, when efficacy of the combination treatment on glycemic control was compared with that of single-drug therapies in each individual patient, the combination was significantly more effective than either metformin or glibenclamide (HbA1c after treatment, 6.1%+/-1.1% v 7.3%+/-1.4%, and 6.5%+/-0.7% v 7.6%+/-1.5%, respectively, both P<.0001). In conclusion, combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea is more effective than these drugs alone in improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, while also allowing a reduction of the dosage of each drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12870162     DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00101-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  14 in total

1.  The influence of drug solubility and sampling frequency on metformin and glibenclamide release from double-layered particles: experimental analysis and mathematical modelling.

Authors:  T Shams; F Brako; S Huo; A H Harker; U Edirisinghe; M Edirisinghe
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Bilayer matrix tablets for prolonged actions of metformin hydrochloride and repaglinide.

Authors:  Wei He; Shijing Huang; Chunyan Zhou; Lin Cao; Jing Yao; Jianping Zhou; Guangji Wang; Lifang Yin
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 3.  Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shelley R Salpeter; Elizabeth Greyber; Gary A Pasternak; Edwin E Salpeter
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

4.  Sulfonylurea versus metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Bianca Hemmingsen; Jeppe B Schroll; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Allan Vaag; David P Sonne; Lars H Lundstrøm; Thomas Almdal
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-07-22

Review 5.  Tolerability profile of metformin/glibenclamide combination tablets (Glucovance): a new treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jaime A Davidson; André J Scheen; Harry C S Howlett
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Racial ethnic differences in type 2 diabetes treatment patterns and glycaemic control in the Boston Area Community Health Survey.

Authors:  Sunali D Goonesekera; May H Yang; Susan A Hall; Shona C Fang; Rebecca S Piccolo; John B McKinlay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Glycemic Effectiveness of Metformin-Based Dual-Combination Therapies with Sulphonylurea, Pioglitazone, or DPP4-Inhibitor in Drug-Naïve Korean Type 2 Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Young Ki Lee; Sun Ok Song; Kwang Joon Kim; Yongin Cho; Younjeong Choi; Yujung Yun; Byung-Wan Lee; Eun-Seok Kang; Bong Soo Cha; Hyun Chul Lee
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.376

8.  Bioequivalence Comparison of Two Formulations of Fixed-Dose Combination Glimepiride/Metformin (2/500 mg)Tablets in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Jung; Jung-Woo Chae; Byung-Jeong Song; Kwang-Il Kwona
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.696

Review 9.  The Hormetic Effect of Metformin: "Less Is More"?

Authors:  Isabella Panfoli; Alessandra Puddu; Nadia Bertola; Silvia Ravera; Davide Maggi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug interactions between gemigliptin (dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor) and glimepiride (sulfonylurea) in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Hee Youn Choi; Yo Han Kim; Mi Jo Kim; Shi Hyang Lee; Keunsu Bang; Song Han; Hyeong-Seok Lim; Kyun-Seop Bae
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.