Literature DB >> 12869240

Attitudes toward group-based inequality: social dominance or social identity?

Michael T Schmitt1, Nyla R Branscombe, Diane M Kappen.   

Abstract

In five studies we explored how the context in which people think about the social structure and the implications of the social structure for one's in-group affect attitudes toward inequality. In Studies 1 and 2 we found that social dominance orientation (SDO) scores reflect attitudes toward specific types of inequality that are salient in context. Consistent with social identity theory, in Studies 3 to 5 we found that SDO scores reflected the interests of specific group identities. Indeed, when we compared existing privileged and disadvantaged groups, and when we manipulated in-group status, we found that participants held more positive attitudes toward inequality when the in-group was privileged, compared to when the in-group was disadvantaged. Across all of our studies, results were consistent with the contention that attitudes toward inequality are group-specific and depend on the social-structural position of salient in-groups. We discuss the implications of our findings for social dominance theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12869240     DOI: 10.1348/014466603322127166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  11 in total

1.  "We get what we deserve": the belief in a just world and its health consequences for Blacks.

Authors:  Nao Hagiwara; Courtney J Alderson; Jessica M McCauley
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-06-28

2.  Do experiences of racial discrimination predict cardiovascular disease among African American men? The moderating role of internalized negative racial group attitudes.

Authors:  David H Chae; Karen D Lincoln; Nancy E Adler; S Leonard Syme
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: an examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors.

Authors:  I-Ching Lee; Felicia Pratto; Blair T Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: how societies mind the gap.

Authors:  Federica Durante; Susan T Fiske; Nicolas Kervyn; Amy J C Cuddy; Adebowale Debo Akande; Bolanle E Adetoun; Modupe F Adewuyi; Magdeline M Tserere; Ananthi Al Ramiah; Khairul Anwar Mastor; Fiona Kate Barlow; Gregory Bonn; Romin W Tafarodi; Janine Bosak; Ed Cairns; Claire Doherty; Dora Capozza; Anjana Chandran; Xenia Chryssochoou; Tilemachos Iatridis; Juan Manuel Contreras; Rui Costa-Lopes; Roberto González; Janet I Lewis; Gerald Tushabe; Jacques-Philippe Leyens; Renée Mayorga; Nadim N Rouhana; Vanessa Smith Castro; Rolando Perez; Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón; Miguel Moya; Elena Morales Marente; Marisol Palacios Gálvez; Chris G Sibley; Frank Asbrock; Chiara C Storari
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-10-05

5.  Intergroup Contact Effects via Ingroup Distancing among Majority and Minority Groups: Moderation by Social Dominance Orientation.

Authors:  Mathias Kauff; Katharina Schmid; Simon Lolliot; Ananthi Al Ramiah; Miles Hewstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Relative Deprivation and Relative Wealth Enhances Anti-Immigrant Sentiments: The V-Curve Re-Examined.

Authors:  Jolanda Jetten; Frank Mols; Tom Postmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is the racial composition of your surroundings associated with your levels of social dominance orientation?

Authors:  Helena R M Radke; Matthew J Hornsey; Chris G Sibley; Michael Thai; Fiona Kate Barlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Social Dominance Orientation Boosts Collective Action Among Low-Status Groups.

Authors:  Catarina L Carvalho; Isabel R Pinto; Rui Costa-Lopes; Darío Páez; Mariana P Miranda; José M Marques
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-11

9.  Belief in school meritocracy as a system-justifying tool for low status students.

Authors:  Virginie Wiederkehr; Virginie Bonnot; Silvia Krauth-Gruber; Céline Darnon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-30

10.  Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie.

Authors:  Ali Teymoori; Jolanda Jetten; Brock Bastian; Amarina Ariyanto; Frédérique Autin; Nadia Ayub; Constantina Badea; Tomasz Besta; Fabrizio Butera; Rui Costa-Lopes; Lijuan Cui; Carole Fantini; Gillian Finchilescu; Lowell Gaertner; Mario Gollwitzer; Ángel Gómez; Roberto González; Ying Yi Hong; Dorthe Høj Jensen; Minoru Karasawa; Thomas Kessler; Olivier Klein; Marcus Lima; Tuuli Anna Mähönen; Laura Megevand; Thomas Morton; Paola Paladino; Tibor Polya; Aleksejs Ruza; Wan Shahrazad; Sushama Sharma; Ana Raquel Torres; Anne Marthe van der Bles; Michael Wohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.