Literature DB >> 12869132

Mucosal vaccination against encapsulated respiratory bacteria--new potentials for conjugate vaccines?

H Jakobsen1, I Jonsdottir.   

Abstract

Polysaccharide (PS)-encapsulated bacteria such as Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus), Neisseria meningitides (meningococcus) and group B streptococcus (GBS), cause a major proportion of disease in early childhood. Native PS vaccines are immunogenic and provide protection against disease in healthy adults but do not induce immunological memory. PSs are T-cell-independent antigens and do not elicit antibodies in infants and young children, but by conjugating PS to proteins they become T-cell dependent and immunogenic at an early age. Despite excellent efficacy of PS-protein conjugate vaccines against invasive disease, protection against mucosal infections such as pneumococcal otitis media has been less efficacious. Circulating PS-specific antibodies may protect against infections at mucosal sites, but mucosal immunoglobulin A antibodies may also contribute significantly to protection against mucosal infections. Mucosal immunization of experimental animals with conjugate vaccines against Hib, pneumococcus, meningococcus and GBS induces systemic and mucosal immune responses, which provide protection against carriage, otitis media and invasive disease in a variety of challenge models, providing new means for protection against encapsulated bacteria. In addition, mucosal immunization of neonatal mice with a pneumococcal conjugate and the nontoxic adjuvant LT-K63 has been superior to parenteral immunization in eliciting protective antibodies and PS-specific memory, and thus circumventing the limitations of antibody responses to PS that are responsible for enhanced susceptibility of neonates and infants to infections caused by encapsulated bacteria. Through T-cell dependent enhanced immunogenicity of PS-protein conjugate vaccines, mucosal immunization could be an attractive approach for early life immunization against encapsulated bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12869132     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2003.01292.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Immunol        ISSN: 0300-9475            Impact factor:   3.487


  13 in total

1.  Antigen replacement of domains D2 and D3 in flagellin promotes mucosal IgA production and attenuates flagellin-induced inflammatory response after intranasal immunization.

Authors:  Jingyi Yang; Maohua Zhong; Yan Zhang; Ejuan Zhang; Ying Sun; Yuan Cao; Yaoming Li; Dihan Zhou; Benxia He; Yaoqing Chen; Yi Yang; Jie Yu; Huimin Yan
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Immunologic screening of children with recurrent otitis media.

Authors:  Selma P Wiertsema; Reinier H Veenhoven; Elisabeth A M Sanders; Ger T Rijkers
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.919

3.  Intranasal immunization with an archaeal lipid mucosal vaccine adjuvant and delivery formulation protects against a respiratory pathogen challenge.

Authors:  Girishchandra B Patel; Hongyan Zhou; Amalia Ponce; Greg Harris; Wangxue Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Controlling invasive pneumococcal disease: is vaccination of at-risk groups sufficient?

Authors:  M A Fletcher; D S Laufer; E D G McIntosh; C Cimino; F J Malinoski
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  C3d adjuvant effects are mediated through the activation of C3d-specific autoreactive T cells.

Authors:  Anne S De Groot; Ted M Ross; Lauren Levitz; Timothy J Messitt; Ryan Tassone; Christine M Boyle; Amber J Vincelli; Leonard Moise; William Martin; Paul M Knopf
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.126

6.  Salmonella Typhi Porins OmpC and OmpF Are Potent Adjuvants for T-Dependent and T-Independent Antigens.

Authors:  Marisol Pérez-Toledo; Nuriban Valero-Pacheco; Rodolfo Pastelin-Palacios; Cristina Gil-Cruz; Christian Perez-Shibayama; Mario A Moreno-Eutimio; Ingeborg Becker; Sonia Mayra Pérez-Tapia; Lourdes Arriaga-Pizano; Adam F Cunningham; Armando Isibasi; Laura C Bonifaz; Constantino López-Macías
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Overview of the Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine Pipeline: Current Status and Future Plans.

Authors:  Sushant Sahastrabuddhe; Tarun Saluja
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Adjuvants are Key Factors for the Development of Future Vaccines: Lessons from the Finlay Adjuvant Platform.

Authors:  Oliver Pérez; Belkis Romeu; Osmir Cabrera; Elizabeth González; Alexander Batista-Duharte; Alexis Labrada; Rocmira Pérez; Laura M Reyes; Wendy Ramírez; Sergio Sifontes; Nelson Fernández; Miriam Lastre
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Safety and immunogenicity of a Vi-DT typhoid conjugate vaccine: Phase I trial in Healthy Filipino adults and children.

Authors:  Maria Rosario Capeding; Samuel Teshome; Tarun Saluja; Khalid Ali Syed; Deok Ryun Kim; Ju Yeon Park; Jae Seung Yang; Yang Hee Kim; Jiwook Park; Sue-Kyoung Jo; Yun Chon; Sudeep Kothari; Seon-Young Yang; Dong Soo Ham; Ji Hwa Ryu; Hee-Seong Hwang; Ju-Hwan Mun; Julia A Lynch; Jerome H Kim; Hun Kim; Jean-Louis Excler; Sushant Sahastrabuddhe
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Adjuvants Enhance the Induction of Germinal Center and Antibody Secreting Cells in Spleen and Their Persistence in Bone Marrow of Neonatal Mice.

Authors:  Audur Anna Aradottir Pind; Magdalena Dubik; Sigrun Thorsdottir; Andreas Meinke; Ali M Harandi; Jan Holmgren; Giuseppe Del Giudice; Ingileif Jonsdottir; Stefania P Bjarnarson
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.