Literature DB >> 12869008

Effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope in the rabbit calvarium.

Yutaka Yamada1, Koichi Nanba, Koichi Ito.   

Abstract

We evaluate the effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope. In eight rabbits, the calvarial bone was exposed and a circular groove was prepared with a trephine drill. After marrow penetration, a standardized hemispherical titanium cap, either with or without small holes (1.5 mm in diameter), was then placed into the bone and covered by a cutaneous flap. After 1 month or 3 months of healing, the animals were euthanized and examined histologically. The percentage area of newly generated tissue consisting of mineralized bone and marrow spaces in each section was calculated relative to the area bounded by the hemispherical shape of the titanium cap and the parent bone; this latter volume was taken to be 100%. Furthermore, the cross-sectional areas of generated mineralized bone expressed as percentages of the total tissue area generated within each space were determined. In the 1-month specimens, there was no statistically significant difference between the two caps in the amount of tissue generated, 54.7%+/-12.2% with holes vs. 60.4%+/-8.8% without holes (p=0.225). However, in the 3-month specimens, we observed a significant difference between the caps (55.9%+/-7.4% with holes vs. 89.9%+/-6.5% without holes, P<0.05). Also, there was a statistically significant difference between 1- and 3-month specimens in the amount of tissue generated under the cap without holes (60.4%+/-8.8% vs. 89.9%+/-6.5%, P<0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the relative amount of mineralized bone generated between the caps with holes and those without holes in the 1-month specimens (27.7%+/-4.8% vs. 30.8%+/-6.4%, P=0.225), there was a statistically significant difference between the two caps in the 3-month specimens (24.3%+/-4.1% with holes vs. 34.0%+/-8.6% without holes, P<0.05). A substantial ingrowth of fibrous connective tissue through the holes appeared to prevent further new tissue generation in a defined area adjacent to the bone surface. We concluded that total occlusiveness, sufficient stiffness of the cap, as well as the passage of time will allow predictable mineralized bone augmentation to occur in spaces beyond the skeletal envelope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12869008     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00832.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

1.  Fibroblast attachment onto novel titanium mesh membranes for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia; Yasunori Ayukawa; Ikiru Atsuta; Akihiro Furuhashi; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Comparison of the Efficiency of Two Novel Guided Bone Regeneration Devices in the Rabbit Calvarial Model.

Authors:  Osama Zakaria
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2020-11-26

3.  A novel osteogenesis technique: The expansible guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Osama Zakaria; Marwa Madi; Shohei Kasugai
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 4.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Combination with Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Laeticia Nassif; Marwan El Sabban
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Regenerative capacity of augmented bone in rat calvarial guided bone augmentation model.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kubota; Akira Hasuike; Yasumasa Ozawa; Takanobu Yamamoto; Katsuyoshi Tsunori; Yutaka Yamada; Shuichi Sato
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  A comparison study between periosteum and resorbable collagen membrane on iliac block bone graft resorption in the rabbit calvarium.

Authors:  Ji-Woong Yang; Hong-Ju Park; Kil-Hwa Yoo; Kwang Chung; Seunggon Jung; Hee-Kyun Oh; Hyung-Seok Kim; Min-Suk Kook
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.151

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.