Literature DB >> 12868639

Saccadic and perceptual performance in visual search tasks. I. Contrast detection and discrimination.

Brent R Beutter1, Miguel P Eckstein, Leland S Stone.   

Abstract

Humans use saccadic eye movements when they search for visual targets. We investigated the relationship between the visual processing used by saccades and perception during search by comparing saccadic and perceptual decisions under conditions in which each had access to equal visual information. We measured the accuracy of perceptual judgments and of the first search saccade over a wide range of target saliences [signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs)] in both a contrast-detection and a contrast-discrimination task. We found that saccadic and perceptual performances (1) were similar across SNRs, (2) showed similar task-dependent differences, and (3) were well described by a model based on signal detection theory that explicitly includes observer uncertainty [M. P. Eckstein et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2406 (1997)1]. Our results demonstrate that the accuracy of the first saccade provides much information about the observer's perceptual state at the time of the saccadic decision and provide evidence that saccades and perception use similar visual processing mechanisms for contrast detection and discrimination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Space Human Factors; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12868639     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.20.001341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  20 in total

1.  Dynamic integration of information about salience and value for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Alexander C Schütz; Julia Trommershäuser; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Foveal analysis and peripheral selection during active visual sampling.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; J Rhys Davies; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Influence of scene structure and content on visual search strategies.

Authors:  Tatiana A Amor; Mirko Luković; Hans J Herrmann; José S Andrade
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Stop before you saccade: Looking into an artificial peripheral scotoma.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Efficient saccade planning requires time and clear choices.

Authors:  Saiedeh Ghahghaei; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  What do saliency models predict?

Authors:  Kathryn Koehler; Fei Guo; Sheng Zhang; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Measurement of the useful field of view for single slices of different imaging modalities and targets.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Ioannis Sechopoulos; François O Bochud; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-08

8.  Time course of target recognition in visual search.

Authors:  Andreas Kotowicz; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Evolution and optimality of similar neural mechanisms for perception and action during search.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Camille Morvan; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.