Literature DB >> 12867759

Is there any difference in pregnancy and implantation rates when nurses perform embryo transfer in an IVF-ET program?

Wai Man Cheung1, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, Estella Yee Lan Lau, William Shu Biu Yeung, William Wai Ki So, Pak Chung Ho.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of fresh in vitro fertilization treatment cycles and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles from mid-1995 to December 31, 1998, was undertaken. Nurses performed embryo transfer (ET) for government-funded cycles, whereas doctors performed ET for self-funded cycles. During the study period, fresh ET was performed in 1,165 treatment cycles. There were no significant differences in demographic data, ovarian responses and the number of embryos replaced between ET cycles performed by nurses and doctors. Pregnancy rates for ETs performed by nurses and doctors were 16.7 and 15.8% per transfer, respectively, whereas the corresponding implantation rates were 8.3 and 6.9%, respectively. Similar pregnancy and implantation rates were encountered in FET cycles whether ET was performed by nurses or doctors. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867759     DOI: 10.1159/000072322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  1 in total

1.  Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany L Rhodes; Thomas P McCoy; H Lee Higdon; William R Boone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.