Literature DB >> 12867546

Relative humidity is a key factor in the acclimation of the stomatal response to CO(2).

Lawrence D Talbott1, Eran Rahveh, Eduardo Zeiger.   

Abstract

Previous work has shown that stomata of growth chamber-grown Vicia faba leaves have an enhanced CO2 response when compared with stomata of greenhouse-grown plants. This guard cell response to CO2 acclimatizes to the environmental conditions on the transfer of plants between the two environments. In the present study, air relative humidity is identified as a key environmental factor mediating the changes in stomatal sensitivity to CO2. In the greenhouse environment, elevation of relative humidity to growth chamber levels resulted in an enhanced CO2 response, whereas a reduction in the light level to that comparable to growth chamber conditions had no effect on stomatal CO2 sensitivity. The transfer of plants between humidified and normal greenhouse conditions resulted in an acclimation response with a time-course matching that previously obtained in transfers of plants between greenhouse and growth chamber environments. The high stomatal sensitivity to CO2 of growth chamber-grown plants could be reduced by lowering growth chamber relative humidity and then restored with its characteristic acclimation time-course by an elevation of relative humidity. Leaf temperature was unchanged during this restoration, eliminating it as a primary factor in the acclimation response. Humidity regulation of stomatal CO2 sensitivity could function as a signal for leaves inside dense foliage canopies, promoting stomatal opening under low light, low CO2 conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867546     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  15 in total

1.  The Clickable Guard Cell, Version II: Interactive Model of Guard Cell Signal Transduction Mechanisms and Pathways.

Authors:  June M Kwak; Pascal Mäser; Julian I Schroeder
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2008-11-26

2.  Stomatal conductance and not stomatal density determines the long-term reduction in leaf transpiration of poplar in elevated CO2.

Authors:  Penny J Tricker; Harriet Trewin; Olevi Kull; Graham J J Clarkson; Eve Eensalu; Matthew J Tallis; Alessio Colella; C Patrick Doncaster; Maurizio Sabatti; Gail Taylor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases.

Authors:  Maeli Melotto; William Underwood; Sheng Yang He
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.078

4.  Fern Stomatal Responses to ABA and CO2 Depend on Species and Growth Conditions.

Authors:  Hanna Hõrak; Hannes Kollist; Ebe Merilo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Cuticular wax deposition in growing barley (Hordeum vulgare) leaves commences in relation to the point of emergence of epidermal cells from the sheaths of older leaves.

Authors:  Andrew Richardson; Rochus Franke; Gerhard Kerstiens; Mike Jarvis; Lukas Schreiber; Wieland Fricke
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO2 in two divergent conifer species.

Authors:  Scott A M McAdam; Timothy J Brodribb; John J Ross; Gregory J Jordan
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  LESION SIMULATING DISEASE 1 is required for acclimation to conditions that promote excess excitation energy.

Authors:  Alfonso Mateo; Per Mühlenbock; Christine Rustérucci; Christine Chi-Chen Chang; Zbigniew Miszalski; Barbara Karpinska; Jane E Parker; Philip M Mullineaux; Stanislaw Karpinski
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Stomatal responses to carbon dioxide and light require abscisic acid catabolism in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mahsa Movahedi; Nicholas Zoulias; Stuart A Casson; Peng Sun; Yun-Kuan Liang; Alistair M Hetherington; Julie E Gray; Caspar C C Chater
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 9.  Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency.

Authors:  Tracy Lawson; Michael R Blatt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Differences between water permeability of astomatous and stomatous cuticular membranes: effects of air humidity in two species of contrasting drought-resistance strategy.

Authors:  Jana Karbulková; Lukas Schreiber; Petr Macek; Jirí Santrucek
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.