Literature DB >> 12867393

Five-year refractive changes in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Magdalena Guzowski1, Jie Jin Wang, Elena Rochtchina, Kathryn A Rose, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine 5-year changes in refractive error and astigmatism in an older population.
DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3654 residents aged 49 years or older from 1992 to 1994. After excluding 543 persons who died since baseline, 2335 (75.1%) attended 5-year examinations from 1997 to 1999.
METHODS: Both examinations included a detailed eye assessment, with subjective refraction performed according to a modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spherical equivalent (sum of sphere + cylinder) was used as the measure of refractive error. Only phakic eyes with best-corrected visual acuity >20/40 were included (n = 3701).
RESULTS: Similar changes in refractive error were observed for the two eyes. Symmetric changes were found in 72% of participants when the difference between eyes was within 0.5 diopters (D) and in 91% when the difference was within 1.0 D. The 5-year change in spherical power was in a hyperopic direction for younger age groups and in a myopic direction for older subjects, P < 0.0001. The gender-adjusted mean change in refractive error in right eyes of persons aged 49 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and 75 years or older at baseline was +0.41 D, +0.30 D, +0.05 D, and -0.22D, respectively. Refractive change was strongly related to baseline nuclear cataract severity; grades 4 to 5 were associated with a myopic shift (-0.33 D, P < 0.0001). Education level and age of onset of myopia, but not gender or diabetes, also predicted refractive change. The mean age-adjusted change in refraction was +0.14 D for hyperopic eyes, +0.32 D for emmetropic eyes, and +0.15 D for myopic eyes. The mean change in cylinder power over the 5-year period was small, irrespective of baseline refraction. The axis of astigmatism remained stable in most cases (64%), whereas 12% changed to "against the rule" and 11% to "with the rule."
CONCLUSIONS: This report has documented refractive error changes in an older population and confirmed reported trends of a hyperopic shift before age 65 years and a myopic shift thereafter associated with the development of nuclear cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867393     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00465-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  22 in total

1.  Longitudinal change of refraction over at least 5 years in 15,000 patients.

Authors:  David Goldblum; Annette Brugger; Andreas Haselhoff; Stefanie Schmickler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Four-year incidence and progression of visual impairment in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Jessica Chung; Athena W P Foong; Mina Torres; Farzana Choudhury; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Nine-year refractive changes in the Barbados Eye Studies.

Authors:  Suh-Yuh Wu; Yun Joo Yoo; Barbara Nemesure; Anselm Hennis; M Cristina Leske
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Nature and nurture: the complex genetics of myopia and refractive error.

Authors:  R Wojciechowski
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Familial aggregation of hyperopia in an elderly population of siblings in Salisbury, Maryland.

Authors:  Robert Wojciechowski; Nathan Congdon; Heidi Bowie; Beatriz Munoz; Donna Gilbert; Sheila West
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Association of Myopia With Risk of Incident Metabolic Syndrome: Findings From the UK Biobank Study Cohort of 91,591 Participants.

Authors:  Yanxian Chen; Zhuoting Zhu; Wei Wang; Xianwen Shang; Mingguang He; Jinying Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-16

7.  Matrix metalloproteinases and educational attainment in refractive error: evidence of gene-environment interactions in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  Robert Wojciechowski; Stephanie S Yee; Claire L Simpson; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The prevalence of refractive conditions in Puerto Rican adults attending an eye clinic system.

Authors:  Neisha M Rodriguez; Angel F Romero
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-06-19

9.  The association between refractive errors and cataract: the tehran eye study.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Mohammad Miraftab; Kazem Mohammad; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04

10.  Generational difference of refractive error in the baseline study of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study.

Authors:  Yuan Bo Liang; Zhong Lin; Balamurali Vasudevan; Vishal Jhanji; Alvin Young; Tie Ying Gao; Shi Song Rong; Ning Li Wang; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.