Literature DB >> 12867220

Pharmacokinetics of a single dose of fulvestrant prolonged-release intramuscular injection in postmenopausal women awaiting surgery for primary breast cancer.

John F R Robertson1, William Odling-Smee, Chris Holcombe, Stanley R Kohlhardt, Mike P Harrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of 3 different single doses of fulvestrant-a new estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downregulates the ER with no known agonist effects-administered as a prolonged-release IM formulation.
METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data were obtained in a randomized, partially blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase I/II multicenter trial involving postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer (clinical stages T1-T3, with tumors that were ER positive or of unknown ER status) awaiting curative-intent surgery. Patients received either IM fulvestrant (50, 125, or 250 mg), oral tamoxifen (20 mg, once daily), or oral placebo (once daily). Treatment started 2 to 3 weeks before surgery and blood was taken at various times up to 12 weeks after fulvestrant administration to assess pharmacokinetic variables.
RESULTS: A total of 200 patients entered the trial, of whom 58 took part in the pharmacokinetic analysis (50 mg, n = 20; 125 mg, n = 16; 250 mg, n = 22). Following single IM injections of fulvestrant, the median time to maximum concentration was 6.98, 6.98, and 6.96 days in the 50-, 125,- and 250-mg dose groups, respectively, with an overall range of 2 to 19 days). The plasma concentration-time profiles were primarily controlled by the rate of absorption from the injection site; post-peak plasma concentrations declined over time and were measurable up to 84 days after administration of fulvestrant 125 and 250 mg. Plasma concentrations at 28 days were 2- to 5-fold lower than the maximum value. Plasma concentration data for the 250-mg dose were best described by a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model, with an apparent terminal phase half-life of approximately 49 days, beginning approximately 3 weeks after administration. Mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve for days 0 through 28 (AUC 0-28) was proportional for fulvestrant 50, 125, and 250 mg. For a doubling of the dose, an analysis of covariance model of the pharmacokinetic data projected an estimated increase in AUC 0-28 of a factor of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.67 to 2.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The IM formulation of fulvestrant used in this study had predictable, dose-linear pharmacokinetics. The prolonged-release properties of this formulation suggested that it may be well suited for the once-monthly dosing schedule intended for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867220     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80131-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  5 in total

1.  Estrogen utilization of IGF-1-R and EGF-R to signal in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Robert X-D Song; Yuchai Chen; Zhenguo Zhang; Yongde Bao; Wei Yue; Ji-Ping Wang; Ping Fan; Richard J Santen
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 2.  Clinical utility of fulvestrant in the treatment of breast cancer: a report on the emerging clinical evidence.

Authors:  Andrea Rocca; Roberta Maltoni; Sara Bravaccini; Caterina Donati; Daniele Andreis
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Estrogen receptor inhibition enhances cold-induced adipocyte beiging and glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Kfir Lapid; Ajin Lim; Eric D Berglund; Yue Lu
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 4.  Whole-Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta-Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Jay R Wiggins; Amandine Coche; Charlotte Fontan; Yann Bouvet; Peter Webner; Chaitanya Divgi; Hannah M Linden
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Gingival cell growth with antiresorptive treatment combined with corticosteroids or antiestrogen.

Authors:  Heidi M Ekholm; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Tero Soukka; Jaana Rautava
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-01-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.