Literature DB >> 12866855

Prevalence and diversity of tetracycline resistant lactic acid bacteria and their tet genes along the process line of fermented dry sausages.

Dirk Gevers1, Liesbeth Masco, Leen Baert, Geert Huys, Johan Debevere, Jean Swings.   

Abstract

In order to study the prevalence and diversity of tetracycline resistant lactic acid bacteria (Tc(r) LAB) along the process line of two different fermented dry sausage (FDS) types, samples from the raw meat, the meat batter and the fermented end product were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively by using a culture-dependent approach. Both the diversity of the tet genes and their bacterial hosts in the different stages of FDS production were determined. Quantitative analysis showed that all raw meat components of both FDS types (FDS-01 and FDS-08) contained a subpopulation of Tc(r) LAB, and that for FDS-01 no Tc(r) LAB could be recovered from the samples after fermentation. Qualitative analysis of the Tc(r) LAB subpopulation in FDS-08 included identification and typing of Tc(r) LAB isolates by (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting, plasmid profiling, protein profiling and a characterization of the resistance by PCR detection of tet genes. Two remarks can be made when the results of this analysis for the different samples are compared. (i) The taxonomic diversity of Tc(r) LAB varies along the process line, with a higher diversity in the raw meat (lactococci, lactobacilli, streptococci, and enterococci), and a decrease after fermentation (only lactobacilli). (ii) Also the genetic diversity of the tet genes varies along the process line. Both tet(M) and tet(S) were found in the raw meat, whereas only tet(M) was found after fermentation. A possible relationship was found between the disappearing of species other than lactobacilli and tet(S), because tet(S) was only found in lacotocci, enterococci, and streptococci. These data suggest that fermented dry sausages are among those food products that can serve as vehicles for Tc(r) LAB and that the raw meat already contains a subpopulation of these bacteria. Whether these results reflect the transfer of resistant bacteria or of bacterial resistance genes from animals to man via the food chain is difficult to ascertain and may require a combination of cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12866855     DOI: 10.1078/072320203322346137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0723-2020            Impact factor:   4.022


  10 in total

1.  Enterococcus faecalis from patients with chronic periodontitis: virulence and antimicrobial resistance traits and determinants.

Authors:  J Sun; A Sundsfjord; X Song
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Acquired resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin antibiotics in lactic Acid bacteria of food origin.

Authors:  Surya Chandra Rao Thumu; Prakash M Halami
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Two different tetracycline resistance mechanisms, plasmid-carried tet(L) and chromosomally located transposon-associated tet(M), coexist in Lactobacillus sakei Rits 9.

Authors:  Mohammed Salim Ammor; Miguel Gueimonde; Morten Danielsen; Monique Zagorec; Angela H A M van Hoek; Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilán; Baltasar Mayo; Abelardo Margolles
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Tetracycline resistance in lactobacilli isolated from Serbian traditional raw milk cheeses.

Authors:  Tijana Ledina; Petra Mohar-Lorbeg; Majda Golob; Jasna Djordjevic; Bojana Bogovič-Matijašić; Snezana Bulajic
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus strains isolated from primary starters for African traditional bread production and characterization of the bacitracin operon and bacitracin biosynthesis.

Authors:  David B Adimpong; Kim I Sørensen; Line Thorsen; Birgitte Stuer-Lauridsen; Warda S Abdelgadir; Dennis S Nielsen; Patrick M F Derkx; Lene Jespersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Update on antibiotic resistance in foodborne Lactobacillus and Lactococcus species.

Authors:  Chiara Devirgiliis; Paola Zinno; Giuditta Perozzi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  A Functional Metagenomic Analysis of Tetracycline Resistance in Cheese Bacteria.

Authors:  Ana B Flórez; Lucía Vázquez; Baltasar Mayo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Antimicrobial Resistance Development Pathways in Surface Waters and Public Health Implications.

Authors:  Joseph Kusi; Catherine Oluwalopeye Ojewole; Akinloye Emmanuel Ojewole; Isaac Nwi-Mozu
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18

9.  Characterisation of the plasmidome within Enterococcus faecalis isolated from marginal periodontitis patients in Norway.

Authors:  Xiaobo Song; Jinglu Sun; Theresa Mikalsen; Adam P Roberts; Arnfinn Sundsfjord
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain: a review.

Authors:  Claire Verraes; Sigrid Van Boxstael; Eva Van Meervenne; Els Van Coillie; Patrick Butaye; Boudewijn Catry; Marie-Athénaïs de Schaetzen; Xavier Van Huffel; Hein Imberechts; Katelijne Dierick; George Daube; Claude Saegerman; Jan De Block; Jeroen Dewulf; Lieve Herman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.