Sharon L Larson1, John A Fleishman. 1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA. slarson@ahrq.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rural-urban disparities in access to and utilization of medical care have been a long-standing focus of concern. OBJECTIVE: Using the nine-category Urban Influence Codes, this study examines the relationship between place of residence and having access and utilization of ambulatory health services. RESEARCH DESIGN: Data come from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, conducted in 1996. Linear and logistic regression analyses assess the relationship between county type and having a usual source of care and ambulatory visits, controlling for demographic and health status measures. RESULTS: Residents of counties that were totally rural were more likely to report having a usual source of care (adjusted OR: 1.98; CI: 1.01, 3.89) than residents of large metropolitan counties. Residents of places without a city of 10,000 or more, but adjacent to a metropolitan area, were also more likely to report having a usual source of care (adjusted OR: 1.92; CI: 1.16, 3.22). In a regression analysis, residents of the most rural places reported fewer visits during the year (B = -2.42, CI: -3.68, -1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that using rural and urban definitions that go beyond the traditional dichotomy of metropolitan and non-metropolitan may assist policymakers and researchers in identifying types of places where there is a disparity in access and subsequent utilization of health care. Rural residents, defined as totally rural in the urban influence coding scheme, may report having a health care provider but report fewer visits to health care providers during a year.
BACKGROUND: Rural-urban disparities in access to and utilization of medical care have been a long-standing focus of concern. OBJECTIVE: Using the nine-category Urban Influence Codes, this study examines the relationship between place of residence and having access and utilization of ambulatory health services. RESEARCH DESIGN: Data come from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, conducted in 1996. Linear and logistic regression analyses assess the relationship between county type and having a usual source of care and ambulatory visits, controlling for demographic and health status measures. RESULTS: Residents of counties that were totally rural were more likely to report having a usual source of care (adjusted OR: 1.98; CI: 1.01, 3.89) than residents of large metropolitan counties. Residents of places without a city of 10,000 or more, but adjacent to a metropolitan area, were also more likely to report having a usual source of care (adjusted OR: 1.92; CI: 1.16, 3.22). In a regression analysis, residents of the most rural places reported fewer visits during the year (B = -2.42, CI: -3.68, -1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that using rural and urban definitions that go beyond the traditional dichotomy of metropolitan and non-metropolitan may assist policymakers and researchers in identifying types of places where there is a disparity in access and subsequent utilization of health care. Rural residents, defined as totally rural in the urban influence coding scheme, may report having a health care provider but report fewer visits to health care providers during a year.
Authors: Christopher Okunseri; Aniko Szabo; Raul I Garcia; Scott Jackson; Nicholas M Pajewski Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: Joseph L Riley; Elizabeth A Pomery; Virginia J Dodd; Keith E Muller; Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Lisa R Shugarman; Melony E S Sorbero; Haijun Tian; Arvind K Jain; J Scott Ashwood Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Guofen Yan; Alfred K Cheung; Jennie Z Ma; Alison J Yu; Tom Greene; M Norman Oliver; Wei Yu; Keith C Norris Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 8.237