Literature DB >> 12864895

Virulence of recent and former classical swine fever virus isolates evaluated by their clinical and pathological signs.

G Floegel-Niesmann1, C Bunzenthal, S Fischer, V Moennig.   

Abstract

The clinical diagnosis of classical swine fever (CSF) still caused problems to the veterinarians during the last decade. The primary CSF outbreak was often detected too late and, meanwhile, the virus had spread. Consequently, the recent classical swine fever virus isolates (CSFV) were suspected to be of low virulence. The purpose of the study was to quantify the virulence of four recent CSFV by evaluating the clinical and pathological signs caused by different CSFV. Pigs of the same breed and age group were inoculated intranasally with CSFV from recent epidemics in European Union (EU) member states. The CSFV used are registered in the data base of the EU Reference Laboratory for CSF and belong to different genotypes: 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 respectively. Clinical signs of CSF were evaluated by using a score system suggested previously (Mittelholzer et al., 2000: Vet. Microbiol. 74, 293). For the evaluation of pathological lesions, a new pathological score was introduced. The four CSFV tested here were classified as moderately virulent in general, although one CSFV may cause different clinical courses, ranging from highly virulent to avirulent. This indicates the importance of additional factors in the host animal for virulence. Differences in the clinical and pathological signs between these four recent CSFV were rather minor, emphasizing that the genetic typing of CSFV is absolutely essential. Differences towards former CSFV (e.g. reference virus strain Alfort 187) were more pronounced, especially regarding the onset and duration of the disease, the occurrence of skin haemorrhages and pathological lesions of kidney, subcutis and serosae. It is concluded that clinical diagnosis of CSF is rather difficult in pigs up to 14 days post-CSFV infection using these four CSFV, emphasizing the need for careful differential diagnosis and the laboratory investigation for CSF at an early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12864895     DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2003.00663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health        ISSN: 0931-1793


  14 in total

1.  Characterization of helper virus-independent cytopathogenic classical swine fever virus generated by an in vivo RNA recombination system.

Authors:  Andreas Gallei; Till Rümenapf; Heinz-Jürgen Thiel; Paul Becher
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Time-calibrated phylogenomics of the classical swine fever viruses: genome-wide bayesian coalescent approach.

Authors:  Taehyung Kwon; Sook Hee Yoon; Kyu-Won Kim; Kelsey Caetano-Anolles; Seoae Cho; Heebal Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Serum Metabolomic Profiling of Piglets Infected with Virulent Classical Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  Wenjie Gong; Junjie Jia; Bikai Zhang; Shijiang Mi; Li Zhang; Xiaoming Xie; Huancheng Guo; Jishu Shi; Changchun Tu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Experimental infection of pigs with a classical swine fever virus isolated in Japan for the first time in 26 years.

Authors:  Ken-Ichiro Kameyama; Tatsuya Nishi; Manabu Yamada; Kentaro Masujin; Kazuki Morioka; Takehiro Kokuho; Katsuhiko Fukai
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  CP7_E2alf oral vaccination confers partial protection against early classical swine fever virus challenge and interferes with pathogeny-related cytokine responses.

Authors:  Patricia Renson; Mireille Le Dimna; André Keranflech; Roland Cariolet; Frank Koenen; Marie-Frédérique Le Potier
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Complete Genome Sequence Analysis of Acute and Mild Strains of Classical Swine Fever Virus Subgenotype 3.2.

Authors:  Seong-In Lim; Song-Hee Han; HyeSook Hyun; Ji-Ae Lim; Jae-Young Song; In-Soo Cho; Dong-Jun An
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-01-28

7.  Antigenic characterization of classical swine fever virus YC11WB isolates from wild boar.

Authors:  Seong-In Lim; Yong Kwan Kim; Ji-Ae Lim; Song-Hee Han; Hee-Suk Hyun; Ki-Sun Kim; Bang-Hun Hyun; Jae-Jo Kim; In-Soo Cho; Jae-Young Song; Sung-Hyun Choi; Seung-Hoe Kim; Dong-Jun An
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 8.  Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Julia Henke; Jolene Carlson; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 9.  A Review of Classical Swine Fever Virus and Routes of Introduction into the United States and the Potential for Virus Establishment.

Authors:  Vienna R Brown; Sarah N Bevins
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-05

10.  Classical Swine Fever Virus Infection Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Autophagy to Sustain Viral Replication in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Erpeng Zhu; Wenxian Chen; Yuwei Qin; Shengming Ma; Shuangqi Fan; Keke Wu; Wenhui Li; Jindai Fan; Lin Yi; Hongxing Ding; Jinding Chen; Mingqiu Zhao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.