Literature DB >> 12864790

Recent concerns surrounding HRT.

Mary Armitage1, Janet Nooney, Stephen Evans.   

Abstract

Millions of women are treated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for relief of menopausal symptoms, including vasomotor flushes and sweats for which oestrogen is uniquely and highly effective. Others may continue longer-term treatment in the hope that HRT will help to prevent chronic disease. The preservation of bone mass with continuing oestrogen therapy and reduction of subsequent risk of fracture is well established. Observational studies of the metabolic and vascular effects of oestrogens have suggested a potential benefit in reducing the risk of vascular disease, but recently published randomized controlled trials demonstrate no evidence of benefit in women with established vascular disease or in apparently healthy women. The increased risks of breast cancer and thromboembolic disease have been confirmed in these trials, with evidence of increased risk of stroke. Observational data suggest there may be a small increased risk of ovarian cancer associated with longer-term use of HRT. The premature termination of one arm of the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial caused concern among patients, doctors and pharmaceutical companies. There are difficulties in extrapolating the results from trials using a specific HRT product to advise women on the wide range of other hormone products, doses, combinations and routes of administration. However, in the absence of evidence that other products are safer, the data suggest that for many women the risks associated with long-term use of HRT outweigh the benefits. There are nonhormonal strategies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. HRT is not, and has never been, licensed in the UK for the prevention or treatment of vascular disease, and the data suggesting potential benefit should now be regarded as biased. The absolute incidence of an adverse event is low, and the risk in an individual woman in a single year is very small, but the risks are cumulative over time with long-term use. The risk-benefit balance of each woman needs regular reappraisal with continued use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12864790     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01815.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  6 in total

1.  Expression of an estrogen receptor agonist in differentiating osteoblast cultures.

Authors:  Thomas L McCarthy; Mary E Clough; Caren M Gundberg; Michael Centrella
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Aetiology, diagnosis, and management of hypopituitarism in adult life.

Authors:  V K B Prabhakar; S M Shalet
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Glycitein decreases the generation of murine osteoclasts and increases apoptosis.

Authors:  Maria Winzer; Martina Rauner; Peter Pietschmann
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-08-16

Review 4.  Ovarian function in girls and women with GALT-deficiency galactosemia.

Authors:  Judith L Fridovich-Keil; Cynthia S Gubbels; Jessica B Spencer; Rebecca D Sanders; Jolande A Land; Estela Rubio-Gozalbo
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 5.  Estrogen, progesterone and epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  TGF-β signaling proteins and CYP24A1 may serve as surrogate markers for progesterone calcitriol treatment in ovarian and endometrial cancers of different histological types.

Authors:  Ana Paucarmayta; Hannah Taitz; Yovanni Casablanca; Gustavo C Rodriguez; G Larry Maxwell; Kathleen M Darcy; Viqar Syed
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.