Literature DB >> 1286422

Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.

M A Laskey1, A J Crisp, T J Cole, J E Compston.   

Abstract

We have investigated whether the Lunar DPX (software 3.4) and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers have comparable normal reference databases for the spine and femur of white UK and USA subjects. After conversion for systematic differences in absolute bone density values between the two systems, the reference databases were very similar for the spine in young subjects, but there were clear differences in the femur databases of young females and males of all ages. These differences were confirmed by comparing the percent age-matched and young values determined by the two systems for subjects scanned on both systems. Thus the diagnosis and management of a patient could differ, depending on the system used for the bone density measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1286422     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-780-1124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

1.  Risk factors for low bone mineral density among a large group of Norwegian women with fractures.

Authors:  L M Omland; G S Tell; S Ofjord; A Skag
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.

Authors:  Klaas P Staal; Jan C Roos; Radu A Manoliu; Piet J Kostense; Paul Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Longitudinal study of bone mineral density in patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  D J de Jong; L Mannaerts; L G M van Rossum; F H M Corstens; A H J Naber
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.

Authors:  M Salleh M Ardawi; Abdulraouf A Maimany; Talal M Bahksh; Hasan A N Nasrat; Waleed A Milaat; Raja M Al-Raddadi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The effects of standardization and reference values on patient classification for spine and femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Simmons; D E Simpson; M J O'Doherty; S Barrington; A J Coakley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  [Vertebral deformity as an index of osteoporosis-induced spinal fracture--an external validity construct based on bone density data].

Authors:  C Scheidt-Nave; D Felsenberg; G Kragi; T Bruckner; G Leidig-Bruckner; C Wüster; R Ziegler
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-03-15

Review 7.  Bone densitometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  J E Compston; C Cooper; J A Kanis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-10

8.  European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  J Pearson; J Dequeker; M Henley; J Bright; J Reeve; W Kalender; A M Laval-Jeantet; P Rüegsegger; D Felsenberg; J Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Patient assessment using standardized bone mineral density values and a national reference database: implementing uniform thresholds for the reimbursement of osteoporosis treatments in Belgium.

Authors:  S Boonen; J-M Kaufman; J-Y Reginster; J-P Devogelaer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  What is osteoporosis?

Authors:  C Christodoulou; C Cooper
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.