Literature DB >> 12861112

In vivo dehydration of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Philip B Morgan1, Nathan Efron.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To benchmark the performance of new-generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses in terms of their in vivo hydration characteristics and to highlight the possible clinical ramifications of any changes observed.
METHODS: Thirteen subjects (four men and nine women with a mean age of 24.8 +/- 5.0 years) wore a silicone hydrogel lens (PureVision, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) in one eye and a conventional hydrogel lens (ACUVUE 2, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, FL) in the other eye for 4 weeks on an extended-wear basis. A gravimetric method was used to determine lens water content and dehydration during the intended lifespan of the lenses.
RESULTS: For the PureVision lens, the water content was 38.3% +/- 0.9%, 35.2% +/- 1.1%, and 35.3% +/- 1.7% at baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks of wear, respectively (F=28.4, P<0.0001). For the ACUVUE 2 lens, the water content was 58.1% +/- 0.6% and 52.1% +/- 1.3% at baseline and after 2 weeks of wear, respectively. Thus, after 2 weeks of wear, absolute dehydration was 2.8% +/- 1.8% and 6.0% +/- 1.3% for the PureVision and ACUVUE 2 lenses, respectively (t=6.8, P<0.0001). The mass of deposition was calculated to be 568 +/- 457 microg for the PureVision lens and 1,660 +/- 499 microg for the ACUVUE 2 lens (t=5.1, P=0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: The ACUVUE 2 lens underwent a greater degree of lens dehydration, causing a reduction in oxygen permeability (3.6 barrer), and deposition after 2 weeks of extended wear. The loss of water from the PureVision lens was paradoxically associated with a 6.0-barrer increase in oxygen permeability after 4 weeks of extended wear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12861112     DOI: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000072825.23491.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of first and second generation silicone hydrogel contact lens wear on tear film osmolarity.

Authors:  Guzin Iskeleli; Yunus Karakoc; Ahmet Ozkok; Ceyhun Arici; Omer Ozcan; Osman Ipcioglu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Extended scan depth optical coherence tomography for evaluating ocular surface shape.

Authors:  Meixiao Shen; Lele Cui; Ming Li; Dexi Zhu; Michael R Wang; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Objective Analysis of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection.

Authors:  Sebastian Marx; Julia Eckstein; Wolfgang Sickenberger
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-11-20

4.  Tear Film Characteristics During Wear of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Giancarlo Montani; Maurizio Martino
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-04

5.  Change in the geometry of positive- and negative-powered soft contact lenses during wear.

Authors:  Bartlomiej J Kaluzny; Joanna Stachura; Patryk Mlyniuk; Alfonso Jimenez-Villar; Magdalena Wietlicka-Piszcz; Ireneusz Grulkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influence of Selected Ophthalmic Fluids on the Wettability and Hydration of Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses-In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Gabriela Chwalik-Pilszyk; Anna Wiśniewska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Evaluation of surface water characteristics of novel daily disposable contact lens materials, using refractive index shifts after wear.

Authors:  Jeffery Schafer; Robert Steffen; William Reindel; Joseph Chinn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-22

8.  Physicochemical stability of contact lenses materials for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Madalena Lira; Cátia Lourenço; Manuela Silva; Gabriela Botelho
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2019-11-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.