Literature DB >> 12859790

The clinical landscape of critical care: nurses' decision-making.

Tracey Bucknall1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies have tended to explore individual characteristics that impact on nurses' decision-making, despite significant acknowledgement that context is a major determinant in decision-making. The few studies that have examined environmental influences have tended not to study real decisions in the dynamic and complex clinical environment. AIMS: To investigate environmental influences on nurses' real decisions in the critical care setting.
METHOD: Naturalistic observations and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 critical care nurses in private, public and rural hospitals. Observations and interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded for themes using content analysis.
RESULTS: All clinical decisions were strongly influenced by the context in which the decision was made. Three main environmental influences were identified: the patient situation, resource availability and interpersonal relationships. Time and risk guided all clinical decisions. Nurses established the state of the situation, the time constraints on decisions and the level of risk involved for both patient and nurse.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making is a manifestation of the landscape and although an increased understanding of the landscape is required, more important is the need to measure the impact of contextual variables on nurses' decision-making in order to improve health care outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12859790     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  8 in total

1.  Measuring Workload Demand of Informatics Systems with the Clinical Case Demand Index.

Authors:  M Sriram Iyengar; Deevakar Rogith; Jose F Florez-Arango
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 2.  Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Christine W Nibbelink; Barbara B Brewer
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  The NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy.

Authors:  Gill Harvey; Louise Fitzgerald; Sandra Fielden; Anne McBride; Heather Waterman; David Bamford; Roman Kislov; Ruth Boaden
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Do nurses reason 'adaptively' in time limited situations: the findings of a descriptive regression analysis.

Authors:  Huiqin Yang; Carl Thompson; Martin Bland
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Advancing beyond the system: telemedicine nurses' clinical reasoning using a computerised decision support system for patients with COPD - an ethnographic study.

Authors:  Tina Lien Barken; Elin Thygesen; Ulrika Söderhamn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  "Having the compass-drawing the map": Exploring nurses' management of pain and other discomforts during use of analgosedation in intensive care.

Authors:  Helene Berntzen; Ida Torunn Bjørk; Hilde Wøien
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-12-18

7.  Nurses' Clinical Decision-Making in a Changed COVID-19 Work Environment: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Britt Laugesen; Maja Thomsen Albrechtsen; Mette Grønkjær; Kathrine Hoffmann Kusk; Marie Germund Nielsen; Lone Jørgensen; Birgith Pedersen; Birgitte Lerbæk; Helle Haslund-Thomsen; Charlotte Brun Thorup; Sara Jacobsen; Karin Bundgaard; Siri Lygum Voldbjerg
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 8.  The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Desirée Kozlowski; Marie Hutchinson; John Hurley; Joanne Rowley; Joanna Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.