Literature DB >> 12859377

Frequency of seborrheic keratosis biopsies in the United States: a benchmark of skin lesion care quality and cost effectiveness.

Maria I Duque1, J Ryan Jordan, Alan B Fleischer, Phillip M Williford, Steven R Feldman, Hoa Teuschler, G John Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most seborrheic keratoses may be readily clinically differentiated from skin cancer, but occasional lesions resemble atypical melanocytic neoplasms.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency, cost, and intensity of procedures performed that result in the removal and histopathologic evaluation of seborrheic keratoses.
METHODS: Episodes of surgical removal of lesions that were identified as seborrheic keratoses by histologic identification were determined using Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data from 1998 to 1999. These episodes were defined by a histopathology procedure code that is associated with a diagnosis code for seborrheic keratosis. We then identified what procedure(s) generated the histopathology specimen. Biopsy and shave procedures were considered "low intensity," whereas excision and repair procedures were considered "high intensity."
RESULTS: Dermatologists managed 85% of all episodes of seborrheic keratoses. Dermatologists managed 89% of seborrheic keratosis episodes using low-intensity procedures compared with 51% by other specialties. For nondermatologists, 46% of the treatment cost (9 million US dollars) to Medicare was generated from high-intensity management compared with 15% by dermatologists (6 million US dollars).
CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in the management of suspicious pigmented lesions between dermatologists and other specialists. This affects both the cost and quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12859377     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29211.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  5 in total

1.  Novice identification of melanoma: not quite as straightforward as the ABCDs.

Authors:  R Benjamin Aldridge; Matteo Zanotto; Lucia Ballerini; Robert B Fisher; Jonathan L Rees
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.437

2.  In vivo diagnosis of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer using oblique incidence diffuse reflectance spectrometry.

Authors:  Alejandro Garcia-Uribe; Jun Zou; Madeleine Duvic; Jeong Hee Cho-Vega; Victor G Prieto; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  [The most common benign cutaneous neoplasms of the epidermis and appendages and their treatment].

Authors:  Seher Eren; Klaus Fritz; Carmen Maria Salavastru; George-Sorin Tiplica
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Computer-Aided Decision Support for Melanoma Detection Applied on Melanocytic and Nonmelanocytic Skin Lesions: A Comparison of Two Systems Based on Automatic Analysis of Dermoscopic Images.

Authors:  Kajsa Møllersen; Herbert Kirchesch; Maciel Zortea; Thomas R Schopf; Kristian Hindberg; Fred Godtliebsen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Recent advances in managing and understanding seborrheic keratosis.

Authors:  Uwe Wollina
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-08-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.