Literature DB >> 12859303

Use of the laryngeal tube in 100 patients.

T Asai1, K Shingu, T Cook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The laryngeal tube has a potential role during anaesthesia, but there have been only a few studies assessing its efficacy during the entire course of anaesthesia, and all previous studies used prototypes. We studied 100 patients to assess the efficacy of a new laryngeal tube during the entire course of anaesthesia.
METHODS: After induction of anaesthesia, the laryngeal tube was inserted (up to two times) and adequacy of ventilation was assessed. The airway pressure at which gas leaked around the device was measured. The device was used during anaesthesia, while ventilation was controlled. The device was removed after the patient had opened the mouth to verbal command. Any complications during and after anaesthesia were recorded.
RESULTS: Ventilation was possible at the first attempt in 90 patients, at the second attempt in another seven patients, and adequate ventilation failed after two attempts in three patients. Median (interquartile range) leak pressure was 28 (22-30) cmH2O. In all 97 patients, the laryngeal tube was used until the end of surgery. However, in two of the 97 patients the airway was partially obstructed during anaesthesia and it was necessary to reposition the device. The laryngeal tube was tolerated well during emergence from anaesthesia. No hypoxia, regurgitation, vomiting or laryngospasm occurred in any patient. On removal of the laryngeal tube, no blood was detected on the device and no apparent ischaemic changes to the tongue were observed in any patient. Post-operatively, six patients complained of a mild sore throat, and no patient complained of difficulty in swallowing or numbness of the oropharynx.
CONCLUSION: The laryngeal tube can be useful for maintaining a patent airway during anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12859303     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00183.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube placement during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck.

Authors:  R Komatsu; O Nagata; K Kamata; K Yamagata; D I Sessler; M Ozaki
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Using a laryngeal tube during cardiac arrest reduces "no flow time" in a manikin study: a comparison between laryngeal tube and endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Christoph H R Wiese; Utz Bartels; Anna Bergmann; Ingo Bergmann; Jan Bahr; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  [Reduction in no flow time using a laryngeal tube: comparison to bag-mask ventilation].

Authors:  C H R Wiese; J Bahr; A Bergmann; I Bergmann; U Bartels; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management.

Authors:  Michael Bernhard; André Gries; Alexandra Ramshorn-Zimmer; Volker Wenzel; Bjoern Hossfeld
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of Propofol and Ketamine-Propofol Mixture (Ketofol) on Laryngeal Tube-Suction II Conditions and Hemodynamics: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Ulku Ozgul; Zekine Begec; Kalender Karahan; Mehmet Ali Erdogan; Mustafa Said Aydogan; Cemil Colak; Mahmut Durmus; M Ozcan Ersoy
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2013-12

6.  Effectiveness of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube suction in elective non-laparoscopic surgeries of up to ninety minutes duration: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Swapnil Verma; S P Sharma
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.