Literature DB >> 12859066

Anterior cervical plate fixation: biomechanical effectiveness as a function of posterior element injury.

Tobias Pitzen1, Chris Lane, Darrell Goertzen, Marcel Dvorak, Charles Fisher, Dragos Barbier, Wolf-Ingo Steudel, Thomas Oxland.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The primary goal of this study was to determine if the stabilization provided to the spine by anterior cervical fixation with plating (ACFP) was dependent on the degree of posterior element injury. The secondary goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of additional posterior screw/rod stabilization in these injuries.
METHODS: Following ACFP with interbody bone graft and stepwise transection of the posterior ligaments and facets at C5-6, eight fresh-frozen human C4-7 spine segments were loaded using pure moments of +/- 1.5 Nm in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending in the intact state. Posterior screw/rod fixation was performed after complete ligamentous destruction and complete removal of the facets. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and pairwise Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to detect changes in the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ). Statistical significance was assumed at a 95% level. Significant increases in ROM occurred in each loading direction after transection of the capsular ligaments (p < 0.001) and again following facetectomy (p < 0.001) compared with the ACFP condition. Additional posterior fixation resulted in a significant decrease in ROM in all loading directions (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in NZ for complete ligamentous destruction compared with ACFP (p < 0.05) and facetectomy compared with ACFP (p < 0.05) for flexion-extension. In lateral bending, a significant increase in NZ was found for facetectomy compared with ACFP (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Capsular ligaments and articular facets are important structures in limiting three-dimensional vertebral motion in the presence of an anterior plate. Supplementary posterior fixation does reduce motion for all injury conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12859066     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2003.99.1.0084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Daniel Briem; Michael Blauth; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The development and evaluation of the subaxial injury classification scoring system for cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Peter G Whang; Alpesh A Patel; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Comparison of anterior-only versus combined anterior and posterior fusion for unstable subaxial cervical injuries: a meta-analysis of biomechanical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Dong-Yeong Lee; Young-Jin Park; Myung-Geun Song; Kun-Tae Kim; Dong-Hee Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Identification of spinal tissues loaded by manual therapy: a robot-based serial dissection technique applied in porcine motion segments.

Authors:  Gregory N Kawchuk; Alejandro Carrasco; Grayson Beecher; Darrell Goertzen; Narasimha Prasad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  [Cervical spine injury. Diagnosis, prognosis and management].

Authors:  C Schüller-Weidekamm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Bartosz Wojewnik; Alexander J Ghanayem; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Leonard I Voronov; Tejaswy Potluri; Robert M Havey; Julia Zelenakova; Alpesh A Patel; Gerard Carandang; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for distractive-flexion injury stage 3 of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Thomas Henriques; Bryan W Cunningham; Paul C McAfee; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.384

8.  Differences between Cervical Schwannomas of the Anterior and Posterior Nerve Roots in Relation to the Incidence of Postoperative Radicular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi; Koichi Iwatsuki; Toshika Ohkawa; Koshi Ninomiya; Takashi Moriwaki; Toshiki Yoshimine
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

9.  Traumatic Cervical Unilateral and Bilateral Facet Dislocations Treated With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Has a Low Failure Rate.

Authors:  Alireza K Anissipour; Julie Agel; Matthew Baron; Erik Magnusson; Carlo Bellabarba; Richard J Bransford
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06

10.  MDCT of acute subaxial cervical spine trauma: a mechanism-based approach.

Authors:  Sameer B Raniga; Venugopal Menon; Khamis S Al Muzahmi; Sajid Butt
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.