Literature DB >> 12857938

Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat.

Rory B Conolly1, Julia S Kimbell, Derek Janszen, Paul M Schlosser, Darin Kalisak, Julian Preston, Frederick J Miller.   

Abstract

Formaldehyde inhalation at 6 ppm and above causes nasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in F344 rats. The human health implications of this effect are of significant interest since human exposure to environmental formaldehyde is widespread, though at lower concentrations than those that cause cancer in rats. In this article, which is part of a larger effort to predict the human cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde, we describe biologically motivated quantitative modeling of the exposure-tumor response continuum in the rat. An anatomically realistic, three-dimensional fluid dynamics model of the F344 rat nasal airways was used to predict site-specific flux of formaldehyde from inhaled air into tissue, since both SCC and preneoplastic lesions develop in a characteristic site-specific pattern. Flux into tissue was used as a dose metric for two modes of action, direct mutagenicity and cytolethality-regenerative cellular proliferation (CRCP), which in turn were linked to key parameters of a two-stage clonal growth model. The direct mutagenicity mode of action was represented by a low dose linear dose-response model of DNA-protein cross-link (DPX) formation. An empirical J-shaped dose-response model and a threshold model fit to the empirical data were used for CRCP. In the clonal growth model, the probability of mutation per cell generation was a function of the tissue concentration of DPX while the rate of cell division was calculated from the CRCP data. Maximum likelihood methods were used to estimate parameter values. Survivor (a nontumor outcome) and tumor data for controls from the National Toxicology Program database and from two formaldehyde inhalation bioassays were used for likelihood calculations. The J-shaped dose-response for CRCP provided a better description of the SCC data than did the threshold model. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the rodent tumor response is due to the CRCP mode of action, with the directly mutagenic pathway having little, if any, influence. When evaluated in light of modeling and database uncertainties, particularly the specification of the clonal growth model and the dose-response data for CRCP, this work provides suggestive though not definitive evidence for a J-shaped dose-response for formaldehyde-mediated nasal SCC in the F344 rat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12857938     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  15 in total

1.  Distribution of DNA adducts caused by inhaled formaldehyde is consistent with induction of nasal carcinoma but not leukemia.

Authors:  Kun Lu; Leonard B Collins; Hongyu Ru; Edilberto Bermudez; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Daniel Acosta; Melvin Andersen; Henry Anderson; John C Bailar; Kim Boekelheide; Robert Brent; Gail Charnley; Vivian G Cheung; Sidney Green; Karl T Kelsey; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Abby A Li; Lawrence McCray; Otto Meyer; Reid D Patterson; William Pennie; Robert A Scala; Gina M Solomon; Martin Stephens; James Yager; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 3.  Formaldehyde carcinogenicity research: 30 years and counting for mode of action, epidemiology, and cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  James A Swenberg; Benjamin C Moeller; Kun Lu; Julia E Rager; Rebecca C Fry; Thomas B Starr
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 1.902

4.  Modeling Dose-response at Low Dose: A Systems Biology Approach for Ionization Radiation.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; Paolo F Ricci
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Uncertainties in biologically-based modeling of formaldehyde-induced respiratory cancer risk: identification of key issues.

Authors:  Ravi P Subramaniam; Chao Chen; Kenny S Crump; Danielle Devoney; John F Fox; Christopher J Portier; Paul M Schlosser; Chad M Thompson; Paul White
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 6.  Carcinogenic potential of formaldehyde in occupational settings: a critical assessment and possible impact on occupational exposure levels.

Authors:  S Duhayon; P Hoet; G Van Maele-Fabry; D Lison
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Cancer effects of formaldehyde: a proposal for an indoor air guideline value.

Authors:  Gunnar Damgård Nielsen; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  The future use of in vitro data in risk assessment to set human exposure standards: challenging problems and familiar solutions.

Authors:  Kenny S Crump; Chao Chen; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  A cancer risk assessment of inner-city teenagers living in New York City and Los Angeles.

Authors:  Sonja N Sax; Deborah H Bennett; Steven N Chillrud; James Ross; Patrick L Kinney; John D Spengler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  What role for biologically based dose-response models in estimating low-dose risk?

Authors:  Kenny S Crump; Chao Chen; Weihsueh A Chiu; Thomas A Louis; Christopher J Portier; Ravi P Subramaniam; Paul D White
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.