Literature DB >> 12856641

Evolution of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) in the management of non-seminomatous testicular cancer (NSGCT).

John P Donohue1.   

Abstract

The metastatic lymphatic drainage of testis cancer to the retroperitoneum was noted clinically about a century ago. Beginning with extraperitoneal approaches, RPLND was attempted. The first cure after RPLND of node positive disease was in 1905 by Cuneo in Paris. Transperitoneal approaches failed due to infection until post World War II experience at Walter Reed Army Hospital. Thoracoabdominal approaches became popular several decades later. But Improved exposure and vascular management strategies led to increased usage of the transabdominal approach once again. The advent of platinum based combination chemotherapy has had a major impact on both the timing of and the technical requirements of RPLND. Owing to our early involvement in this area, we have accumulated the largest database available on this disease. Our experience with over 2500 RPLNDs in the last 3 decades is divided between low stage (I and II) and high stage (III, postchemotherapy) disease. The former has been "down-regulated" to modified templates and prospective nerve sparing techniques to preserve ejaculation. The latter has been "up-regulated" to include a spectrum of surgical needs including hepatic, vascular, gut and mediastinal resections. Despite these extended requirements, outcomes are good (> 80% survival) postchemotherapy. The evolutionary change of RPLND reflects an optimal paradigm of surgical-medical oncologic interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12856641     DOI: 10.1016/s1078-1439(02)00212-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  9 in total

Review 1.  Critical evaluation of modified templates and current trends in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Shane Pearce; Zoe Steinberg; Scott Eggener
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  [Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testis cancer].

Authors:  T Pottek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer. Diagnostic and prognostic significance as well as therapeutic benefit].

Authors:  S Krege; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Sperm banking and the cancer patient.

Authors:  Daniel H Williams
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-02

Review 5.  Fertility preservation in the male with cancer.

Authors:  Daniel H Williams
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Testicular cancer.

Authors:  Liang Cheng; Peter Albers; Daniel M Berney; Darren R Feldman; Gedske Daugaard; Timothy Gilligan; Leendert H J Looijenga
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  Associations of serum levels of microRNA-371a-3p (M371) with risk factors for progression in nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumours clinical stage 1.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Dieckmann; Cansu Dumlupinar; Arlo Radtke; Cord Matthies; Renate Pichler; Pia Paffenholz; Jörg Sommer; Alexander Winter; Friedemann Zengerling; Finja Hennig; Christian Wülfing; Gazanfer Belge
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Is there still a place for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage 1 nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell tumours? A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  K-P Dieckmann; P Anheuser; M Kulejewski; R Gehrckens; B Feyerabend
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Major complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary cohort of patients with testicular cancer and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christian Guido Ruf; Simon Krampe; Cord Matthies; Petra Anheuser; Tim Nestler; Jörg Simon; Hendrik Isbarn; Klaus Peter Dieckmann
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.