MOTIVATION: Predicting the outcome of specific experiments (such as the growth of a particular mutant strain in a particular medium) has the potential to allow researchers to devote resources to experiments with higher expected numbers of 'hits'. RESULTS: We use decision trees to predict phenotypes associated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes on the basis of Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotations from the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) and other phenotypic annotations from the Yeast Phenotype Catalog at the Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS). We assess the methodology in three ways: (1) we use cross-validation on the phenotypic annotations listed in MIPS, and show ROC curves indicating the tradeoff between true-positive rate and false-positive rate; (2) we do a literature-search for 100 of the predicted gene-phenotype associations that are not listed in MIPS, and find evidence for 43 of them; (3) we use deletion strains to experimentally assess 61 predicted gene-phenotype associations not listed in MIPS; significantly more of these deletion strains show abnormal growth than would be expected by chance.
MOTIVATION: Predicting the outcome of specific experiments (such as the growth of a particular mutant strain in a particular medium) has the potential to allow researchers to devote resources to experiments with higher expected numbers of 'hits'. RESULTS: We use decision trees to predict phenotypes associated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes on the basis of Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotations from the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) and other phenotypic annotations from the Yeast Phenotype Catalog at the Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS). We assess the methodology in three ways: (1) we use cross-validation on the phenotypic annotations listed in MIPS, and show ROC curves indicating the tradeoff between true-positive rate and false-positive rate; (2) we do a literature-search for 100 of the predicted gene-phenotype associations that are not listed in MIPS, and find evidence for 43 of them; (3) we use deletion strains to experimentally assess 61 predicted gene-phenotype associations not listed in MIPS; significantly more of these deletion strains show abnormal growth than would be expected by chance.
Authors: Tanya Z Berardini; Suparna Mundodi; Leonore Reiser; Eva Huala; Margarita Garcia-Hernandez; Peifen Zhang; Lukas A Mueller; Jungwoon Yoon; Aisling Doyle; Gabriel Lander; Nick Moseyko; Danny Yoo; Iris Xu; Brandon Zoeckler; Mary Montoya; Neil Miller; Dan Weems; Seung Y Rhee Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Gabriel Musso; Murat Tasan; Christian Mosimann; John E Beaver; Eva Plovie; Logan A Carr; Hon Nian Chua; Julie Dunham; Khalid Zuberi; Harold Rodriguez; Quaid Morris; Leonard Zon; Frederick P Roth; Calum A MacRae Journal: Development Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Murat Taşan; Gabriel Musso; Tong Hao; Marc Vidal; Calum A MacRae; Frederick P Roth Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Lei Bao; Lai Wei; Jeremy L Peirce; Ramin Homayouni; Hongqiang Li; Mi Zhou; Hao Chen; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Lawrence M Pfeffer; Dan Goldowitz; Yan Cui Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2006-06-12 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Murat Taşan; Harold J Drabkin; John E Beaver; Hon Nian Chua; Julie Dunham; Weidong Tian; Judith A Blake; Frederick P Roth Journal: G3 (Bethesda) Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 3.154