Literature DB >> 12855341

Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies.

Gwendolijne G M Scholten-Peeters1, Arianne P Verhagen, Geertruida E Bekkering, Daniëlle A W M van der Windt, Les Barnsley, Rob A B Oostendorp, Erik J M Hendriks.   

Abstract

We present a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Our aim was to assess prognostic factors associated with functional recovery of patients with whiplash injuries. The failure of some patients to recover following whiplash injury has been linked to a number of prognostic factors. However, there is some inconsistency in the literature and there have been no systematic attempts to analyze the level of evidence for prognostic factors in whiplash recovery. Studies were selected for inclusion following a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the database of the Dutch Institute of Allied Health Professions up until April 2002 and hand searches of the reference lists of retrieved articles. Studies were selected if the objective was to assess prognostic factors associated with recovery; the design was a prospective cohort study; the study population included at least an identifiable subgroup of patients suffering from a whiplash injury; and the paper was a full report published in English, German, French or Dutch. The methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. A study was considered to be of 'high quality' if it satisfied at least 50% of the maximum available quality score. Two independent reviewers extracted data and the association between prognostic factors and functional recovery was calculated in terms of risk estimates. Fifty papers reporting on twenty-nine cohorts were included in the review. Twelve cohorts were considered to be of 'high quality'. Because of the heterogeneity of patient selection, type of prognostic factors and outcome measures, no statistical pooling was able to be performed. Strong evidence was found for high initial pain intensity being an adverse prognostic factor. There was strong evidence that for older age, female gender, high acute psychological response, angular deformity of the neck, rear-end collision, and compensation not being associated with an adverse prognosis. Several physical (e.g. restricted range of motion, high number of complaints), psychosocial (previous psychological problems), neuropsychosocial factors (nervousness), crash related (e.g. accident on highway) and treatment related factors (need to resume physiotherapy) showed limited prognostic value for functional recovery. High initial pain intensity is an important predictor for delayed functional recovery for patients with whiplash injury. Often mentioned factors like age, gender and compensation do not seem to be of prognostic value. Scientific information about prognostic factors can guide physicians or other care providers to direct treatment and to probably prevent chronicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12855341     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00050-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  72 in total

1.  Seniority of the first-treating doctor does not influence the outcome of acute whiplash injury: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver Pieske; Toralf Weinhold; Jochen Buck; Stefan Piltz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Axial head rotation increases facet joint capsular ligament strains in automotive rear impact.

Authors:  Steven G Storvik; Brian D Stemper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Predictors for work participation in individuals with an Autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anja Holwerda; Jac J L van der Klink; Johan W Groothoff; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

4.  A prospective cohort study of health outcomes following whiplash associated disorders in an Australian population.

Authors:  T Rebbeck; D Sindhusake; I D Cameron; G Rubin; A-M Feyer; J Walsh; M Gold; W N Schofield
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Whiplash can have lesions.

Authors:  Nikolai Bogduk
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  Quality of life among children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Vranceanu; Vanessa L Merker; Elyse R Park; Scott R Plotkin
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Prognostic factors of disability in older people: a systematic review.

Authors:  Umit Tas; Arianne P Verhagen; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Else Odding; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Positive cervical artery testing in a patient with chronic whiplash syndrome: clinical decision-making in the presence of diagnostic uncertainty.

Authors:  David L Graziano; Wanda Nitsch; Peter A Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

10.  Factors related to non-recovery from whiplash. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT).

Authors:  Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Keith J Petrie; Ingvard Wilhelmsen; Hanne Gro Wenzel; Børge Sivertsen
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.