Literature DB >> 12855317

Selective attentional bias, conscious awareness and the fear of pain.

Edmund Keogh1, Trevor Thompson, Ian Hannent.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that healthy individuals with a high fear of pain possess a selective attentional bias in favour of pain-related material. However, evidence is limited since only a few studies have been conducted to date. In addition, these studies have not yet examined whether such attentional biases are relatively automatic, and so are outside conscious control. We, therefore, conducted a study with unmasked (conscious) and masked (preconscious) versions of the visual dot-probe task, and examined the effect of pain fearfulness on performance. In the masked trials, we confirmed that individuals with a low fear of pain seem to orient away from pain-related material. Furthermore, we also found that when stimuli were masked, this bias was reversed. Neither effect was found amongst participants high in the fear of pain. Together, these findings suggest that the ability to orient away from pain-related stimuli may be under conscious control in low fearful people, whereas such a mechanism does not seem to exist in those high in the fear of pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12855317     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00468-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  9 in total

1.  Interrelation of self-report, behavioural and electrophysiological measures assessing pain-related information processing.

Authors:  Oliver Dittmar; Rüdiger Krehl; Stefan Lautenbacher
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Attentional and emotional mechanisms of pain processing and their related factors: a structural equations approach.

Authors:  Claudia Huber; Miriam Kunz; Cordula Artelt; Stefan Lautenbacher
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Manipulation of pain catastrophizing: An experimental study of healthy participants.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Adam T Hirsh; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Effects of context and individual predispositions on hypervigilance to pain-cues: an ERP study.

Authors:  Oliver Dittmar; Corinna Baum; Raphaela Schneider; Stefan Lautenbacher
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Indirect acquisition of pain-related fear: an experimental study of observational learning using coloured cold metal bars.

Authors:  Kim Helsen; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Negative expectations interfere with the analgesic effect of safety cues on pain perception by priming the cortical representation of pain in the midcingulate cortex.

Authors:  Abeer F Almarzouki; Christopher A Brown; Richard J Brown; Matthew H K Leung; Anthony K P Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  No preconscious attentional bias towards itch in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Jennifer M Becker; Henning Holle; Dimitri M L van Ryckeghem; Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Andrea W M Evers; Ralph C A Rippe; Antoinette I M van Laarhoven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Vigilance for pain-related faces in a primary task paradigm: an ERP study.

Authors:  Stefan Lautenbacher; Oliver Dittmar; Corinna Baum; Raphaela Schneider; Edmund Keogh; Miriam Kunz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Does expecting more pain make it more intense? Factors associated with the first week pain trajectories after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Reetta M Sipilä; Lassi Haasio; Tuomo J Meretoja; Samuli Ripatti; Ann-Mari Estlander; Eija A Kalso
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.926

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.