Literature DB >> 12855211

Who's getting the message? Intervention response rates among women who inject drugs and/or smoke crack cocaine.

Claire E Sterk1, Katherine P Theall, Kirk W Elifson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Injection drug users (IDUs) who also smoke crack may be at greatest risk for infection with HIV as well as other blood-borne and sexually transmitted infections and in most need of positive behavioral changes.
METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-three women (aged 18-59 years) were randomly assigned to one of two enhanced gender- and culturally specific HIV intervention conditions or to the NIDA standard condition. Of primary interest in this study were baseline risk and intervention response rates among three groups of drug users--IDUs who did not smoke crack, IDUs who did smoke crack, and crack smokers who did not inject. Univariate and multivariate methods were utilized, including generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: The intervention produced positive behavioral changes over time, but response rates varied according to drug using group. Overall, women falling into the crack smoking IDU category appeared to be less responsive to the intervention than those in the other drug using groups, and participants in the crack smoking only group were less responsive than those in the IDU only group.
CONCLUSIONS: Results presented here indicate the continuing need to develop and target effective interventions to particular subgroups of high-risk individuals who may be most resistant to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12855211     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00090-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  6 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical Foundations of Research Focused on HIV Prevention Among Substance-Involved Women: A Review of Observational and Intervention Studies.

Authors:  Judith D Auerbach; Laramie R Smith
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 2.  Best-evidence interventions: findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia M Lyles; Linda S Kay; Nicole Crepaz; Jeffrey H Herbst; Warren F Passin; Angela S Kim; Sima M Rama; Sekhar Thadiparthi; Julia B DeLuca; Mary M Mullins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A randomized trial of enhanced HIV risk-reduction and vaccine trial education interventions among HIV-negative, high-risk women who use noninjection drugs: the UNITY study.

Authors:  Beryl A Koblin; Sebastian Bonner; Donald R Hoover; Guozhen Xu; Debbie Lucy; Princess Fortin; Sara Putnam; Mary H Latka
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Potential uptake and correlates of willingness to use a supervised smoking facility for noninjection illicit drug use.

Authors:  Courtney L C Collins; Thomas Kerr; Laura M Kuyper; Kathy Li; Mark W Tyndall; David C Marsh; Julio S Montaner; Evan Wood
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 5.  Psychosocial interventions for reducing injection and sexual risk behaviour for preventing HIV in drug users.

Authors:  Nicholas Meader; Ryan Li; Don C Des Jarlais; Stephen Pilling
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

6.  Individual action and community context: the Health Intervention Project.

Authors:  Claire E Sterk; Kirk W Elifson; Katherine P Theall
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.043

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.