Literature DB >> 12854987

Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients 80 years or older: the views of patients and their physicians.

Heather O'Donnell1, Russell S Phillips, Neil Wenger, Joan Teno, Roger B Davis, Mary Beth Hamel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preferences of hospitalized patients aged 80 and older. To examine physicians' perceptions of their patients' preferences and agreement between patients' and physicians' preferences, estimation of prognosis, and assessment of quality of life.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Four academic hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 80 years or older hospitalized between January 1993 and November 1994. MEASUREMENTS: Detailed clinical data were collected by chart review and interview. Patients and physicians were interviewed to determine their preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Agreement between patients and physicians was assessed using the kappa statistic, which measures agreement beyond chance.
RESULTS: Of the 1266 patients studied, their median age was 85 years, and 61% were female. The majority (55%) of the 1010 patients with CPR preference information available desired CPR. Compared with patients, fewer physicians wanted CPR (36%) if they were in their patients' condition. Agreement between patients' preferences and physicians' perceptions of these preferences was low (absolute agreement 63%, kappa = 0.21). Agreement was better between physicians' perceptions of patients' preferences and physicians' desire for themselves if they were in their patients' condition (66%, kappa = 0.36). Agreement between patients' and physicians' estimates of survival was only slight (46%, kappa = 0.10). The majority of the disagreement occurred when the physician's prognostic estimate was worse than the patient's.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of hospitalized patients 80 years older wanted CPR. When asked to imagine themselves in the same clinical situation as their patients, physicians were much less likely to want CPR and viewed CPR as undesirable for most patients. Physicians' estimates of patients' prognoses were less optimistic than patients' estimates, raising the possibility that physicians' knowledge of older patients' poor outcomes from CPR explains their lack of enthusiasm about CPR for most patients 80 years and older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12854987     DOI: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000064464.85732.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  8 in total

1.  What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N J Shaheen; J M Inadomi; B F Overholt; P Sharma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients.

Authors:  Andrew M Courtwright; Joshua Abrams; Ellen M Robinson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Patient-physician agreement on the content of CHD prevention discussions.

Authors:  Lindy Behrend; Hossein Maymani; Megan Diehl; Ziya Gizlice; Jianwen Cai; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Patient-Reported Receipt of Goal-Concordant Care Among Seriously Ill Outpatients-Prevalence and Associated Factors.

Authors:  Matthew E Modes; Susan R Heckbert; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth L Nielsen; J Randall Curtis; Erin K Kross
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Life-sustaining treatment preferences: matches and mismatches between patients' preferences and clinicians' perceptions.

Authors:  Lois Downey; David H Au; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Seriously Ill Patients' Prioritized Goals and Their Clinicians' Perceptions of Those Goals.

Authors:  Matthew E Modes; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Lyndia C Brumback; Thanh H Neville; Anne M Walling; J Randall Curtis; Erin K Kross
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.576

7.  Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs.

Authors:  Caroline M Quill; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Michael O Harhay; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unrepresented Patients in the ICU. An Official American Thoracic Society/American Geriatrics Society Policy Statement.

Authors:  Thaddeus M Pope; Joshua Bennett; Shannon S Carson; Lynette Cederquist; Andrew B Cohen; Erin S DeMartino; David M Godfrey; Paula Goodman-Crews; Marshall B Kapp; Bernard Lo; David C Magnus; Lynn F Reinke; Jamie L Shirley; Mark D Siegel; Renee D Stapleton; Rebecca L Sudore; Anita J Tarzian; J Daryl Thornton; Mark R Wicclair; Eric W Widera; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.