Literature DB >> 12854834

Irreversible perforations in vertebral trabeculae?

X Banse1, J P Devogelaer, C Delloye, A Lafosse, D Holmyard, M Grynpas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In human cancellous bone, osteoclastic perforations resulting from normal remodeling were generally considered irreversible. In human vertebral samples, examined by backscatter electron microscopy, there was clear evidence of bridging of perforation defects by new bone formation. Hence trabecular perforations may not be irreversible.
INTRODUCTION: Preservation of the trabecular bone microarchitecture is essential to maintain its load-bearing capacity and prevent fractures. However, during bone remodeling, the osteoclasts may perforate the platelike trabeculae and disconnect the structure. Large perforations (>100 microm) are generally considered irreversible because there is no surface on which new bone can be laid down. In this work, we investigated the outcome of these perforations on human vertebral cancellous bone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using backscatter electron microscopy, we analyzed 264 vertebral bone samples from the thoracic and lumbar spine of nine subjects (44-88 years old). Nine fields (2 x 1.5 mm) were observed on each block. Several bone structural units (BSUs) were visible on a single trabecula, illustrating a dynamic, historical aspect of bone remodeling. A bridge was defined as a single and recent BSU connecting two segments of trabeculae previously separated by osteoclastic resorption. They were counted and measured (length and breadth, microm). RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: We observed 396 bridges over 2376 images. By comparison, we found only 15 microcalluses on the same material. The median length of the bridge was 165 microm (range, 29-869 microm); 86% being longer than 100 microm and 35% longer than 200 microm. Their breadth was 56 microm (range, 6-255 microm), but the thinnest were still in construction. Bridges were found in all nine subjects included in the study, suggesting that it is a common feature of normal vertebral bone remodeling. These observations support the hypothesis that perforation could be repaired by new bone formation, and hence, might not be systematically irreversible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12854834     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.7.1247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  5 in total

1.  Molecular Consequences of the SERPINH1/HSP47 Mutation in the Dachshund Natural Model of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Uschi Lindert; Mary Ann Weis; Jyoti Rai; Frank Seeliger; Ingrid Hausser; Tosso Leeb; David Eyre; Marianne Rohrbach; Cecilia Giunta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Efficacy of etidronate and sequential monofluorophosphate in severe postmenopausal osteoporosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  J D Ringe; A Dorst; H Faber; C Kipshoven; L C Rovati; I Setnikar
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Raman spectroscopy of the human nail: a potential tool for evaluating bone health?

Authors:  M R Towler; A Wren; N Rushe; J Saunders; N M Cummins; P M Jakeman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 4.727

4.  50 years of scanning electron microscopy of bone-a comprehensive overview of the important discoveries made and insights gained into bone material properties in health, disease, and taphonomy.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Krisztina Ruscsák; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 5.  Nail Properties and Bone Health: A Review.

Authors:  Pouya Saeedi; Amin Shavandi; Kim Meredith-Jones
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-04-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.