Literature DB >> 12854787

Four post-and-core combinations as abutments for fixed single crowns: a prospective up to 10-year study.

Stefan Ellner1, Tom Bergendal, Bo Bergman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the present prospective study, four different post-and-core systems were evaluated over a period of up to 10 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty endodontically treated teeth in 31 patients were randomized to one of four groups for post-and-core placement: Group 1 received conventional tapered cast posts and cores (n = 14); group 2 received ParaPost system prefabricated gold posts with cast cores (n = 13); group 3 received ParaPost system cast posts and cores (n = 13); and group 4 received Radix-Anchor posts (n = 10). Clinical and radiologic evaluations were made.
RESULTS: One post and core in group 2 was functioning well 58 months after placement when the patient died. No posts and cores in groups 1 or 2 had been lost or had any complications, one in group 3 had been lost because of a root fracture after 108 months, and two in group 4 had been lost after 54 and 88 months, respectively, because of loss of retention. The final treatment result for 46 of the 49 remaining posts (30 patients) was successful. The overall failure rate was 6%. There were no statistically significant differences between the four groups.
CONCLUSION: If recommended procedures are strictly followed, posts and cores can serve as abutments for fixed single crowns with satisfactory long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12854787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  8 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of survival rates of post-and-cores in a dental school setting.

Authors:  Nicole Martino; Caroline Truong; Arthur E Clark; Edgar O'Neill; Shu-Min Hsu; Dan Neal; Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  A retrospective evaluation of teeth restored with zirconia ceramic posts: 10-year results.

Authors:  Maria Bateli; Matthias Kern; Martin Wolkewitz; Jörg R Strub; Wael Att
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Survival Rates of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Restored with All-Ceramic Partial-Coverage Crowns: When Systematic Review Fails.

Authors:  Marco Ferrari; Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco; Denise Irene Karin Pontoriero; Carlo Ercoli; Kostantinos Chochlidakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Effect of tapering internal coronal walls on fracture resistance of anterior teeth treated with cast post and core: In vitro study.

Authors:  Loubna Shamseddine; Rita Eid; Fodda Homsy; Hasan Elhusseini
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2014-08-12

5.  Universal adhesives and dual-cured core buildup composite material: adhesive properties.

Authors:  Pâmela Malaquias; Mario Felipe Gutiérrez; Elisama Sutil; Thalita de Paris Matos; Taise Alessandra Hanzen; Alessandra Reis; Jorge Perdigão; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 6.  An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Evaluating the Success Rate of Prosthetic Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Amirhossein Fathi; Behnaz Ebadian; Sara Nasrollahi Dezaki; Nahal Mardasi; Ramin Mosharraf; Sabire Isler; Shiva Sadat Tabatabaei
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 7.  A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study the load capacity and clinical behaviour of the root filled teeth.

Authors:  Ronald Ordinola-Zapata; Fei Lin; Sanket Nagarkar; Jorge Perdigão
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  A survey of failed post-retained restorations.

Authors:  A Peutzfeldt; A Sahafi; E Asmussen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.