OBJECT: This study was performed to determine whether moderate hypothermia (31 degrees C) improves clinical outcome in severely head injured patients whose intracranial hypertension cannot be controlled using mild hypothermia (34 degrees C). METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive severely head injured patients who fulfilled the following criteria were included in this study: an intracranial pressure (ICP) that remained higher than 40 mm Hg despite the use of mild hypothermia combined with conventional therapies; and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less on admission. After the failure of mild hypothermia in combination with conventional therapies; patients were exposed to moderate hypothermia as quickly as possible. As brain temperature was reduced from 34 to 31 degrees C, the volume of intravenous fluid infusion was increased significantly from 1.9 +/- 0.9 to 2.6 +/- 1.2 mg/kg/hr (p < 0.01), and the dose of dopamine infusion increased significantly from 4.3 +/- 3.1 to 8.2 +/- 4.4 microg/kg/min (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate decreased significantly from 97.1 +/- 13.1 to 85.1 +/- 10.5 mm Hg (p < 0.01) and from 92.2 +/- 13.8 to 72.2 +/- 14.3 beats/minute at (p < 0.01) at 34 and 31 degrees C, respectively. Arterial base excess was significantly aggravated from -3.3 +/- 4 at 34 degrees C to -5.6 +/- 5.4 mEq/L (at 31 degrees C; p < 0.05). Likewise, serum potassium concentration, white blood cell counts, and platelet counts at 31 degrees C decreased significantly compared with those at 34 degrees C (p < 0.01). In 19 (86%) of 22 patients, elevation of ICP could not be prevented using moderate hypothermia. In the remaining three patients. ICP was maintained below 40 mm Hg by inducing moderate hypothermia; however, these three patients died of multiple organ failure. These results clearly indicate that moderate hypothermia induces complications more severe than those induced by mild hypothermia without improving outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that moderate hypothermia is not effective in improving clinical outcomes in severely head injured patients whose ICP remains higher than 40 mm Hg after treatment with mild hypothermia combined with conventional therapies.
OBJECT: This study was performed to determine whether moderate hypothermia (31 degrees C) improves clinical outcome in severely head injured patients whose intracranial hypertension cannot be controlled using mild hypothermia (34 degrees C). METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive severely head injured patients who fulfilled the following criteria were included in this study: an intracranial pressure (ICP) that remained higher than 40 mm Hg despite the use of mild hypothermia combined with conventional therapies; and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less on admission. After the failure of mild hypothermia in combination with conventional therapies; patients were exposed to moderate hypothermia as quickly as possible. As brain temperature was reduced from 34 to 31 degrees C, the volume of intravenous fluid infusion was increased significantly from 1.9 +/- 0.9 to 2.6 +/- 1.2 mg/kg/hr (p < 0.01), and the dose of dopamine infusion increased significantly from 4.3 +/- 3.1 to 8.2 +/- 4.4 microg/kg/min (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate decreased significantly from 97.1 +/- 13.1 to 85.1 +/- 10.5 mm Hg (p < 0.01) and from 92.2 +/- 13.8 to 72.2 +/- 14.3 beats/minute at (p < 0.01) at 34 and 31 degrees C, respectively. Arterial base excess was significantly aggravated from -3.3 +/- 4 at 34 degrees C to -5.6 +/- 5.4 mEq/L (at 31 degrees C; p < 0.05). Likewise, serum potassium concentration, white blood cell counts, and platelet counts at 31 degrees C decreased significantly compared with those at 34 degrees C (p < 0.01). In 19 (86%) of 22 patients, elevation of ICP could not be prevented using moderate hypothermia. In the remaining three patients. ICP was maintained below 40 mm Hg by inducing moderate hypothermia; however, these three patients died of multiple organ failure. These results clearly indicate that moderate hypothermia induces complications more severe than those induced by mild hypothermia without improving outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that moderate hypothermia is not effective in improving clinical outcomes in severely head injured patients whose ICP remains higher than 40 mm Hg after treatment with mild hypothermia combined with conventional therapies.
Authors: Guy L Clifton; Alex Valadka; David Zygun; Christopher S Coffey; Pamala Drever; Sierra Fourwinds; L Scott Janis; Elizabeth Wilde; Pauline Taylor; Kathy Harshman; Adam Conley; Ava Puccio; Harvey S Levin; Stephen R McCauley; Richard D Bucholz; Kenneth R Smith; John H Schmidt; James N Scott; Howard Yonas; David O Okonkwo Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Alireza Faridar; Eric M Bershad; Tenbit Emiru; Paul A Iaizzo; Jose I Suarez; Afshin A Divani Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 4.003