Literature DB >> 12854107

Recommendations for screening intervals for small aortic aneurysms.

R J McCarthy1, E Shaw, M R Whyman, J J Earnshaw, K R Poskitt, B P Heather.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine the optimum rescreening interval for small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
METHODS: Data from 12 years of population screening of 65-year-old men were analysed and 1121 small AAAs (less than 4.0 cm in initial diameter) were divided into groups: group 1 (2.6-2.9 cm; n = 625), group 2 (3.0-3.4 cm; n = 330) and group 3 (3.5-3.9 cm; n = 166). Expansion rate and the cumulative proportions to expand to over 5.5 cm, or require surgery, or rupture were calculated.
RESULTS: Expansion rate was related to initial aortic diameter: 0.09 cm per year in group 1, 0.16 cm per year in group 2 and 0.32 cm per year in group 3 (P < 0.001). Aneurysms in 2.4 per cent of patients in group 1 exceeded a diameter of 5.5 cm or required surgery within 5 years; there were no ruptures. In group 2, no aorta exceeded 5.5 cm but at 3 years 2.1 per cent had reached 5.5 cm and 2.9 per cent had required surgery. The rupture rate at 3 years was zero. In group 3, the aneurysm diameter exceeded 5.5 cm in 1.2 per cent of patients, but no patient required surgery or experienced rupture within 1 year; at 2 years 10.5 per cent of aneurysms had exceeded 5.5 cm in diameter or required surgery and 1.4 per cent had ruptured.
CONCLUSION: The appropriate rescreening interval can be determined by initial aortic diameter in screened 65-year-old men. AAAs of initial diameter 2.6-2.9 cm should be rescanned at 5 years, those of 3.0-3.4 cm at 3 years and those of 3.5-3.9 cm at 1 year. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12854107     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

1.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men.

Authors:  J J Earnshaw; E Shaw; M R Whyman; K R Poskitt; B P Heather
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-08

2.  Ultrasound surveillance of ectatic abdominal aortas.

Authors:  S Devaraj; S R Dodds
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Lifestyle and Risk of Screening-Detected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Men.

Authors:  Otto Stackelberg; Alicja Wolk; Ken Eliasson; Anders Hellberg; Adam Bersztel; Susanna C Larsson; Nicola Orsini; Anders Wanhainen; Martin Björck
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 4.  Prevalence and natural history of and risk factors for subaneurysmal aorta among 65-year-old men.

Authors:  Knut Thorbjørnsen; Sverker Svensjö; Khatereh Djavani Gidlund; Nils-Peter Gilgen; Anders Wanhainen
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.384

5.  Long term outcomes in men screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  John L Duncan; Kirsten A Harrild; Lisa Iversen; Amanda J Lee; David J Godden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.