Literature DB >> 12853879

Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of esophageal and gastric carcinoma.

Stuart J Mercer1, Shaw S Somers, Louise A Knight, Pauline A Whitehouse, Sanjay Sharma, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Sharon Glaysher, Simon Toh, Ian A Cree.   

Abstract

Esophageal and gastric cancer have a poor prognosis, and chemotherapy is rarely of long-term benefit. This may be related in part to heterogeneity of chemosensitivity and to constitutive resistance to individual cytotoxic drugs. This study aimed to demonstrate the degree of heterogeneity of chemosensitivity between tumors. We have examined the heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal and gastric cancer specimens (n=85) using an ex vivo ATP-based chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). A variety of chemotherapeutic agents were tested. Sixty-four specimens were endoscopic biopsy samples; the remainder were from resection specimens. Cells were obtained from 62 specimens (73%). Eight assays were infected due to contamination/infection of the biopsy material, giving an evaluability rate of 87%. Analysis of the data showed considerable heterogeneity of chemosensitivity. The most active single agents identified by the assay were mitomycin C (56% sensitivity) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 42% sensitivity). Exposure of tumor cells to combinations of drugs showed ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-FU) and mitomycin C+5-FU to be moderately active regimens. Other experimental drug combinations showed greater activity. There is a marked heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal and gastric cancers. The degree of heterogeneity observed suggests that the ATP-TCA could be used to individualize chemotherapy by selecting agents for particular patients. This approach provides the rationale for a trial of ATP-TCA-directed therapy to determine whether individualization of chemotherapy might improve patient response and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12853879     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200307000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  6 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal cancer using ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay.

Authors:  Zhi-qiang Ling; Chun-jian Qi; Xiao-xiao Lu; Li-juan Qian; Lin-hui Gu; Zhi-guo Zheng; Qiang Zhao; Shi Wang; Xian-hua Fang; Zhi-xing Yang; Jian Yin; Wei-min Mao
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Predictive value of MTT assay as an in vitro chemosensitivity testing for gastric cancer: one institution's experience.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Jin-Shui Zhu; Yi Zhang; Wei-Ming Shen; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Human glioma demonstrates cell line specific results with ATP-based chemiluminescent cellular proliferation assays.

Authors:  Michael E Sughrue; Martin J Rutkowski; Ari J Kane; Andrew T Parsa
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Suppression of primary breast, colon, gastric and bladder cancers cell growth in vitro by CKBM, a natural product.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Edgar S L Liu; Jun Fu; Hai-Mei Tian; Ying-Jye Wu; Shiu-Fun Pang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.651

5.  Feasibility of chemosensitivity testing in soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Marcus Lehnhardt; Thomas Muehlberger; Cornelius Kuhnen; Daniel Brett; Hans U Steinau; Hamid Joneidi Jafari; Lars Steinstraesser; Oliver Müller; Heinz H Homann
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Combination chemotherapy in advanced gastrointestinal cancers: ex vivo sensitivity to gemcitabine and mitomycin C.

Authors:  P A Whitehouse; S J Mercer; L A Knight; F Di Nicolantonio; A O'Callaghan; I A Cree
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.