Literature DB >> 12853673

Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings.

Yong Yeon Jeong1, Heoung Keun Kang, Tae Woong Chung, Jeong Jin Seo, Jin Gyoon Park.   

Abstract

Cervical carcinoma is one of the most frequent causes of death in women. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are the primary modalities for follow-up of treated cervical carcinoma. A normal vaginal cuff after hysterectomy appears as a smooth, low-signal-intensity muscular wall on T2-weighted MR images. Early (2-3 months after treatment) and significant decreases in the signal intensity and volume of the tumor at MR imaging indicate a good response to radiation therapy. Sites of recurrence are the pelvis, lymph nodes, and distant sites. Pelvic recurrence appears as a heterogeneously enhancing mass at contrast material-enhanced CT and often appears as a heterogeneous, high-signal-intensity mass at T2-weighted MR imaging. Lymph node recurrence ranges from scattered, minimally enlarged nodes to large, conglomerate nodal masses. Determination of neoplastic infiltration of lymph nodes is based on size; most researchers consider nodes greater than 1 cm in short-axis diameter to be metastatic. Distant metastases are usually due to recurrent disease and occur in the abdomen, thorax, and bone. Knowledge of the normal therapeutic changes and the spectrum of recurrent tumor in patients with cervical carcinoma is important for accurate interpretation of follow-up CT and MR images. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12853673     DOI: 10.1148/rg.234035001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  20 in total

1.  Cervical cancer: MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gulgun Engin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis at a referral center for cancer.

Authors:  Patrícia Prando Cardia
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

3.  Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review).

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Roberta Tana; Stefania Cosio; Luca Cionini
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Domeki; Yasushi Kaji; Satoru Morita; Narufumi Suganuma; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  [Malignant neoplasms of the female pelvis].

Authors:  K-J Lehmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Correlation between clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of local response after standard treatment in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Izaskun Valduvieco; Albert Biete; Iván Rios; Ricardo Llorente; Angels Rovirosa; Jaume Pahisa; Laura Vidal; Blanca Farrús; Pilar Samper
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-06-18

Review 7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and MRI in Predicting the Tumor Response in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma Treated by Chemoradiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sharareh Sanei Sistani; Fateme Parooie; Morteza Salarzaei
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Pre-exenterative chemotherapy, a novel therapeutic approach for patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Lopez-Graniel; Rigoberto Dolores; Lucely Cetina; Aaron Gonzalez; David Cantu; Jose Chanona; Jesus Uribe; Myrna Candelaria; Rocio Brom; Jaime de la Garza; Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with 18F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Yoshiko Ueno; Tomonori Kanda; Tetsuo Maeda; Natsuko Makihara; Yasuhiko Ebina; Hideto Yamada; Satoru Takahashi; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 10.  Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours - a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

Authors:  J E Husband; L H Schwartz; J Spencer; L Ollivier; D M King; R Johnson; R Reznek
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.