Literature DB >> 12852712

Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

Richard G Wunderink1, Sue K Cammarata, Thomas H Oliphant, Marin H Kollef.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy and tolerability of linezolid were demonstrated in a previously published, randomized, double-blind, registration study comparing linezolid with vancomycin for the empiric treatment of 396 patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to obtain additional experience with linezolid and vancomycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia and to satisfy international regulatory requirements.
METHODS: Patients with pneumonia acquired after 48 hours in an inpatient facility were randomly assigned to receive either IV linezolid 600 mg or IV vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours for 7 to 21 consecutive days. Patients also received IV aztreonam 1 to 2 g every 8 hours, which could be discontinued if gram-negative pathogens were not identified. The primary efficacy variables were clinical and microbiologic outcomes in evaluable patients at the follow-up visit 15 to 21 days after the end of therapy. Results from the continuation study were analyzed separately and did not include patients from the previously reported study.
RESULTS: A total of 623 patients were enrolled: 321 in the linezolid group and 302 in the vancomycin group. Mean (SD) ages were 63.1 (19.1) years and 61.9 (19.3) years, respectively. Mean (SD) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were 14.1 (5.8) and 14.1 (6.2), respectively. There were no significant differences between the linezolid and vancomycin groups at the follow-up visit in clinical cure rates (114/168 [67.9%] and 111/171 [64.9%]) or microbiologic success rates (47/76 [61.8%] and 42/79 [53.2%]) in evaluable patients (excluding those who had indeterminate or missing outcomes). There were also no significant differences in the rates of all drug-related adverse events (14.0% and 14.0%) or those that occurred in > 1% of patients, including diarrhea (3.7% and 3.0%), nausea (0.3% and 1.3%), and rash (0.6% and 1.7%) in the linezolid and vancomycin groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In the population studied, linezolid appeared to be as well tolerated and as effective as vancomycin, each in combination with aztreonam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12852712     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80118-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  41 in total

1.  Linezolid in VAP by MRSA: a better choice?

Authors:  Malina Ioanas; Hartmut Lode
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of vancomycin for the treatment of patients with gram-positive infections: focus on the study design.

Authors:  Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Michael N Mavros; Nikolaos Roussos; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  Linezolid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; David P Figgitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Good clinical outcomes but high rates of adverse reactions during linezolid therapy for serious infections: a proposed protocol for monitoring therapy in complex patients.

Authors:  Emma Bishop; Sharmila Melvani; Benjamin P Howden; Patrick G P Charles; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of linezolid versus teicoplanin in bacteremia by Gram-positive microorganisms.

Authors:  Santiago Grau; Javier Mateu-de Antonio; Javier Soto; Mónica Marín-Casino; Esther Salas
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-12

6.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Tsuji; Nicholas H G Holford; Hidefumi Kasai; Chika Ogami; Young-A Heo; Yoshitsugu Higashi; Akiko Mizoguchi; Hideto To; Yoshihiro Yamamoto
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  H Jiang; R-N Tang; J Wang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  LEADER Program results for 2009: an activity and spectrum analysis of linezolid using 6,414 clinical isolates from 56 medical centers in the United States.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Rodrigo E Mendes; James E Ross; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Linezolid surveillance results for the United States: LEADER surveillance program 2011.

Authors:  Robert K Flamm; Rodrigo E Mendes; James E Ross; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid and Ertapenem in experimental parapneumonic pleural effusion.

Authors:  Maria Saroglou; Stavros Tryfon; Georgios Ismailos; Ioannis Liapakis; Manolis Tzatzarakis; Aristidis Tsatsakis; Apostolos Papalois; Demosthenes Bouros
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.