Literature DB >> 12851562

Magnetic resonance imaging scanner reliability for measuring changes in vestibular schwannoma size.

William H Slattery1, Laurel M Fisher, Gloria Yoon, Gregory Sorensen, Michael Lev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the intracranial tumor measurement reliability of three different magnetic resonance imaging machines. STUDY
DESIGN: Neurofibromatosis Type 2 patients were imaged at three different facilities, two studies per facility, for a total of six studies per patient. Seven subjects were imaged.
SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Neurofibromatosis Type 2 patients. OUTCOME MEASURE: All tumors were measured by greatest diameter (in millimeters) and volume (in cubic centimeters). Schwannomas were measured in the anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions (in millimeters), using the petrous ridge as an anatomic landmark.
RESULTS: The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging measurement (greatest diameter, volume) of meningiomas and vestibular schwannomas were analyzed together. There were no statistically significant differences by magnetic resonance imaging machine. There was a trend for one scanner to produce greater differences between Test 1 and Test 2 than the other scanners. The minimal detectable change in tumor size for measuring greatest diameter and volume across scanners was calculated.
CONCLUSION: The minimal detectable change in greatest diameter (under the study acquisition protocol) was determined to be 1.1 mm. The minimal detectable change in volume (under the study acquisition protocol) was determined to be +/-0.15 cm(3). These results may be used when designing clinical trials using vestibular schwannoma or meningioma size changes as an outcome variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851562     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  4 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of vestibular schwannomas treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Sumit Kapoor; Sachin Batra; Kathryn Carson; John Shuck; Siddharth Kharkar; Rahul Gandhi; Juan Jackson; Jan Wemmer; Stephanie Terezakis; Ori Shokek; Lawrence Kleinberg; Daniele Rigamonti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Comparing size evaluation methods for acoustic neuroma after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Anneyuko I Saito; Christopher G Morris; Kana Ito; Futoshi Watanabe; Kumiko Karasawa; William M Mendenhall; Yutaka Naoi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-08-27

3.  Follow-up assessment of vestibular schwannomas: volume quantification versus two-dimensional measurements.

Authors:  Rick van de Langenberg; Bert Jan de Bondt; Patty J Nelemans; Brigitta G Baumert; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  A comparison of semi-automated volumetric vs linear measurement of small vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Samuel MacKeith; Tilak Das; Martin Graves; Andrew Patterson; Neil Donnelly; Richard Mannion; Patrick Axon; James Tysome
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.