Literature DB >> 12851279

Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

Edward Abraham1, Konrad Reinhart, Steven Opal, Ignace Demeyer, Christopher Doig, Angel López Rodriguez, Richard Beale, Petr Svoboda, Pierre Francois Laterre, Stuart Simon, Bruce Light, Herbert Spapen, Judy Stone, Allan Seibert, Claus Peckelsen, Cathy De Deyne, Russell Postier, Ville Pettilä, Charles L Sprung, Antonio Artigas, Sandra R Percell, Vincent Shu, Christian Zwingelstein, Jeffrey Tobias, Lona Poole, James C Stolzenbach, Abla A Creasey.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The expression and release of tissue factor is a major trigger for the activation of coagulation in patients with sepsis. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) forms a complex with tissue factor and blood protease factors leading to inhibition of thrombin generation and fibrin formation.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if administration of tifacogin (recombinant TFPI) provides mortality benefit in patients with severe sepsis and elevated international normalized ratio (INR) and to assess tifacogin safety in severe sepsis, including patients with low INR. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from March 21, 2000, through September 27, 2001, in 245 hospitals in 17 countries in North America, Europe, and Israel. PATIENTS: The primary efficacy population consisted of 1754 patients (> or =18 years) with severe sepsis and a high INR (> or =1.2) randomly assigned to intravenous infusion of either tifacogin (0.025 mg/kg per hour for 96 hours, n = 880) or placebo (arginine citrate buffer, n = 874), and 201 patients with a low INR (<1.2) randomly assigned to receive the same dose of either tifacogin or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause 28-day mortality.
RESULTS: Overall mortality at 28 days in the tifacogin-treated group (n = 880) vs the placebo group (n = 874) for high INR was 34.2% vs 33.9%, respectively (P =.88, Pearson chi2 test; P =.75, logistic regression model). None of the protocol-specified secondary end points differed between the tifacogin vs placebo groups. An analysis on the first 722 patients demonstrated a mortality rate of 38.9% for placebo vs 29.1% for tifacogin (P =.006, Pearson chi2 test). Tifacogin significantly attenuated prothrombin fragment 1.2 and thrombin:antithrombin complex levels (P<.001, 2-sample t test) in patients with high and low INR. Overall mortality was lower in the tifacogin response in patients with low INR (12%; n = 83) vs placebo (22.9%; n = 118) (P =.051, Pearson chi2 test; P =.03, logistic regression model). There was an increase in serious adverse events with bleeding in the tifacogin group in both cohorts (6.5% tifacogin and 4.8% placebo for high INR; 6.0% tifacogin and 3.3% placebo for low INR).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tifacogin had no effect on all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and high INR. Tifacogin administration was associated with an increase in risk of bleeding, irrespective of baseline INR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851279     DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.2.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  212 in total

Review 1.  Coagulation in sepsis.

Authors:  André Amaral; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [Thrombophilic states in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  L Engelmann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  New antithrombotic drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Weitz; John W Eikelboom; Meyer Michel Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Classification of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: the impact of minor variations in data capture and definition of SIRS criteria.

Authors:  Peter M C Klein Klouwenberg; David S Y Ong; Marc J M Bonten; Olaf L Cremer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  The endothelium: physiological functions and role in microcirculatory failure during severe sepsis.

Authors:  H Ait-Oufella; E Maury; S Lehoux; B Guidet; G Offenstadt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Low levels of tissue factor lead to alveolar haemorrhage, potentiating murine acute lung injury and oxidative stress.

Authors:  Julie A Bastarache; Sara C Sebag; Jennifer K Clune; Brandon S Grove; William E Lawson; David R Janz; L Jackson Roberts; Ryszard Dworski; Nigel Mackman; Lorraine B Ware
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Francis Pike; Donald M Yealy; John A Kellum; David T Huang; Amber E Barnato; Tammy L Eaton; Derek C Angus; Lisa A Weissfeld
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  A recombinant fragment of von Willebrand factor reduces fibrin-rich microthrombi formation in mice with endotoxemia.

Authors:  Trung C Nguyen; Francisca Gushiken; Juliana I Correa; Jing-Fei Dong; Swapan K Dasgupta; Perumal Thiagarajan; Miguel A Cruz
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Epidemiology of sepsis: recent advances.

Authors:  Pajman Danai; Greg S Martin
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 10.  The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Tom van der Poll; Frank L van de Veerdonk; Brendon P Scicluna; Mihai G Netea
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 53.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.