CONTEXT: Clinical trials demonstrating increased risk of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer among women randomized to hormone replacement therapy have increased interest in other therapies for menopausal symptoms. Dietary supplements containing isoflavones are widely used as alternatives to hormonal therapies for hot flashes, but there is a paucity of data supporting their efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 dietary supplements derived from red clover with placebo in symptomatic menopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of menopausal women, aged 45 to 60 years, who were experiencing at least 35 hot flashes per week. The study was conducted between November 1999 and March 2001 at 3 US medical centers and included women who were recently postmenopausal (mean [SD], 3.3 [4.5] years since menopause) experiencing 8.1 hot flashes per day. Women were excluded if they were vegetarians, consumed soy products more than once per week, or took medications affecting isoflavone absorption. INTERVENTION: After a 2-week placebo run-in, 252 participants were randomly assigned to Promensil (82 mg of total isoflavones per day), Rimostil (57 mg of total isoflavones per day), or an identical placebo, and followed-up for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was the change in frequency of hot flashes measured by participant daily diaries. Secondary outcome measures included changes in quality of life and adverse events. RESULTS:Of 252 participants, 246 (98%) completed the 12-week protocol. The reductions in mean daily hot flash count at 12 weeks were similar for the Promensil (5.1), Rimostil (5.4), and placebo (5.0) groups. In comparison with the placebo group, participants in the Promensil group (41%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-51%; P =.03), but not in the Rimostil group (34%; 95% CI, 22%-46%; P =.74) reduced hot flashes more rapidly. Quality-of-life improvements and adverse events were comparable in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Although the study provides some evidence for a biological effect of Promensil, neither supplement had a clinically important effect on hot flashes or other symptoms of menopause.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Clinical trials demonstrating increased risk of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer among women randomized to hormone replacement therapy have increased interest in other therapies for menopausal symptoms. Dietary supplements containing isoflavones are widely used as alternatives to hormonal therapies for hot flashes, but there is a paucity of data supporting their efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 dietary supplements derived from red clover with placebo in symptomatic menopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of menopausal women, aged 45 to 60 years, who were experiencing at least 35 hot flashes per week. The study was conducted between November 1999 and March 2001 at 3 US medical centers and included women who were recently postmenopausal (mean [SD], 3.3 [4.5] years since menopause) experiencing 8.1 hot flashes per day. Women were excluded if they were vegetarians, consumed soy products more than once per week, or took medications affecting isoflavone absorption. INTERVENTION: After a 2-week placebo run-in, 252 participants were randomly assigned to Promensil (82 mg of total isoflavones per day), Rimostil (57 mg of total isoflavones per day), or an identical placebo, and followed-up for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was the change in frequency of hot flashes measured by participant daily diaries. Secondary outcome measures included changes in quality of life and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 252 participants, 246 (98%) completed the 12-week protocol. The reductions in mean daily hot flash count at 12 weeks were similar for the Promensil (5.1), Rimostil (5.4), and placebo (5.0) groups. In comparison with the placebo group, participants in the Promensil group (41%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-51%; P =.03), but not in the Rimostil group (34%; 95% CI, 22%-46%; P =.74) reduced hot flashes more rapidly. Quality-of-life improvements and adverse events were comparable in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Although the study provides some evidence for a biological effect of Promensil, neither supplement had a clinically important effect on hot flashes or other symptoms of menopause.
Authors: P B Clifton-Bligh; M-L Nery; R J Clifton-Bligh; S Visvalingam; G R Fulcher; K Byth; R Baber Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Lucia Bacciottini; Alberto Falchetti; Barbara Pampaloni; Elisa Bartolini; Anna Maria Carossino; Maria Luisa Brandi Journal: Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab Date: 2007-05
Authors: Nancy E Reame; Jane L Lukacs; Vasantha Padmanabhan; Aimee D Eyvazzadeh; Yolanda R Smith; Jon-Kar Zubieta Journal: Menopause Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Stacie E Geller; Lee P Shulman; Richard B van Breemen; Suzanne Banuvar; Ying Zhou; Geena Epstein; Samad Hedayat; Dejan Nikolic; Elizabeth C Krause; Colleen E Piersen; Judy L Bolton; Guido F Pauli; Norman R Farnsworth Journal: Menopause Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.953