Literature DB >> 12851114

Human health risk and exposure assessment of chromium (VI) in tap water.

Dennis J Paustenbach1, Brent L Finley, Fionna S Mowat, Brent D Kerger.   

Abstract

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] has been detected in groundwater across the United States due to industrial and military operations, including plating, painting, cooling-tower water, and chromate production. Because inhalation of Cr(VI) can cause lung cancer in some persons exposed to a sufficient airborne concentration, questions have been raised about the possible hazards associated with exposure to Cr(VI) in tap water via ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. Although ingested Cr(VI) is generally known to be converted to Cr(III) in the stomach following ingestion, prior to the mid-1980s a quantitative analysis of the reduction capacity of the human stomach had not been conducted. Thus, risk assessments of the human health hazard posed by contaminated drinking water contained some degree of uncertainty. This article presents the results of nine studies, including seven dose reconstruction or simulation studies involving human volunteers, that quantitatively characterize the absorbed dose of Cr(VI) following contact with tap water via all routes of exposure. The methodology used here illustrates an approach that permits one to understand, within a very narrow range, the possible intake of Cr(VI) and the associated health risks for situations where little is known about historical concentrations of Cr(VI). Using red blood cell uptake and sequestration of chromium as an in vivo metric of Cr(VI) absorption, the primary conclusions of these studies were that: (1) oral exposure to concentrations of Cr(VI) in water up to 10 mg/L (ppm) does not overwhelm the reductive capacity of the stomach and blood, (2) the inhaled dose of Cr(VI) associated with showering at concentrations up to 10 mg/L is so small as to pose a de minimis cancer hazard, and (3) dermal exposures to Cr(VI) in water at concentrations as high as 22 mg/L do not overwhelm the reductive capacity of the skin or blood. Because Cr(VI) in water appears yellow at approximately 1-2 mg/L, the studies represent conditions beyond the worst-case scenario for voluntary human exposure. Based on a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for chromium derived from published studies, coupled with the dose reconstruction studies presented in this article, the available information clearly indicates that (1) Cr(VI) ingested in tap water at concentrations below 2 mg/L is rapidly reduced to Cr(III), and (2) even trace amounts of Cr(VI) are not systemically circulated. This assessment indicates that exposure to Cr(VI) in tap water via all plausible routes of exposure, at concentrations well in excess of the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum contaminant level of 100 microg/L (ppb), and perhaps those as high as several parts per million, should not pose an acute or chronic health hazard to humans. These conclusions are consistent with those recently reached by a panel of experts convened by the State of California.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851114     DOI: 10.1080/15287390306388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  7 in total

1.  Exposure to hexavalent chromium resulted in significantly higher tissue chromium burden compared with trivalent chromium following similar oral doses to male F344/N rats and female B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  Bradley J Collins; Matthew D Stout; Keith E Levine; Grace E Kissling; Ronald L Melnick; Timothy R Fennell; Ramsey Walden; Kamal Abdo; John B Pritchard; Reshan A Fernando; Leo T Burka; Michelle J Hooth
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Biochemical and reproductive biomarker analysis to study the consequences of heavy metal burden on health profile of male brick kiln workers.

Authors:  Mehwish David; Sarwat Jahan; Javaid Hussain; Humaira Rehman; Karen J Cloete; Tayyaba Afsar; Ali Almajwal; Nawaf W Alruwaili; Suhail Razak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Oral Chromium Exposure and Toxicity.

Authors:  Hong Sun; Jason Brocato; Max Costa
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Chromium in drinking water: sources, metabolism, and cancer risks.

Authors:  Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  Adverse hematological effects of hexavalent chromium: an overview.

Authors:  Rina Rani Ray
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-17

6.  Thermodynamic investigation with chemical kinetic analysis on the reoxidation phenomenon of the Cr(iii) in air.

Authors:  Qining Liu; Honghui Liu; Huixia Chen; Xinrun Wang; Dahai Hu; Xichuan Cheng; Hongbin Xu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Groundwater contaminated with hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)]: a health survey and clinical examination of community inhabitants (Kanpur, India).

Authors:  Priti Sharma; Vipin Bihari; Sudhir K Agarwal; Vipin Verma; Chandrasekharan N Kesavachandran; Balram S Pangtey; Neeraj Mathur; Kunwar Pal Singh; Mithlesh Srivastava; Sudhir K Goel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.